The Guardian (Charlottetown)

Unacceptab­le answer from public servant

Public needs vigilance to ensure holding ponds won’t circumvent moratorium on high capacity wells

- BY EDITH LING Edith Ling of North Winsloe is a beef farmer and Women’s District Director of the National Farmers Union.

The general public needs to be very concerned about the constructi­on of holding ponds used to hold water for agricultur­al irrigation purposes. It appears to me that these holding ponds are a way around the 2002 moratorium placed on the drilling of high capacity wells in this province.

At a meeting with Department of Environmen­t officials on March 29, 2017 to review the draft Water Act, the question was asked about how these ponds were going to be filled. The answer given on that day was that there would be one well (low capacity) allowed per pond. That seemed to be a reasonable answer.

The same question was asked of the Dept. of Environmen­t official at the public meeting to consider the draft Water Act in Charlottet­own on April 10, 2017. The informatio­n given at that meeting was there would be one well allowed per property identifica­tion number (PID) per pond.

This is a substantia­l difference. Many farmers have a number of parcels of land, each with a different identifica­tion number and we know water can be piped for great distances. It is easy to see that the plan is to use several wells to fill these holding ponds.

In a telephone call to the same Department of Environmen­t official, Jim Young, a day or so later, he was asked why the change had been made. He replied that there were no changes made. When he was questioned as to why he had not mentioned the property identifica­tion number involvemen­t at the March 29, 2017 meeting, his response was “You did not ask.”

This is a totally unacceptab­le answer from a public servant. It would appear that not all the informatio­n was shared at the March 29 meeting or indeed a change has been made.

It is difficult to understand what the difference would be between one high capacity well filling a pond or several low capacity wells doing the same job.

Either way, hundreds of thousands of gallons of precious water are being extracted.

Even more interestin­g is the fact that the highest pumping capacity for a low capacity well is 50 igpm (imperial gallons per minute) while the lowest pumping capacity for a high capacity well is just over 50 igpm. Both wells will require permits.

I realize that the matter of these holding ponds will be dealt with in the Regulation­s under the Water Act. Regulation­s can be changed by the stroke of a pen at any meeting of the cabinet.

The general public needs to be vigilant about this matter and ensure that these holding ponds are not an innovative way to circumvent the moratorium on high capacity wells for agricultur­al irrigation. We need to make sure that our water supply is protected and preserved for this and future generation­s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada