The Guardian (Charlottetown)

Building your legitimate power

Influence behaviour without working hard

- Joe Sherren +PTFQI 4IFSSFO JOUFSOBUJP­OBM CVTJ OFTT USBOTGPSNB­UJPO TQFDJBMJTU DBO CF SFBDIFE BU PS DIFDL IJT XFCTJUF XXX HBUFXBZMFB­EFSTIJQ DPN

In many of my seminars I speak about the importance of using power to get things done. But first let me say all power is good, yet power can be bad. It is the utility of power that makes it good or bad.

There are two types of power that we use to modify the behaviour of others: (1) position power and (2) personal power.

Both are equally important to being a successful leader or coach.

These two types are further subdivided into eight power bases. Position power includes: coercive, associatio­n, legitimate, and precedence, whereas personal power includes: reward, informatio­n, expert, and connection.

The legitimate power base has fallen out of favour over the past few years and we have been socially conditione­d to believe it’s bad. This trend is causing managers to work significan­tly harder to get done what needs to be done.

The two aspects of legitimate power which have been popular to dismiss lately are:

Dressing profession­ally to achieve the outcome you are trying to accomplish.

Providing managers with an office that reflects the management status they have attained.

Interestin­gly, there is now a (quiet) movement to reverse both these viewpoints. In terms of clothing, many of us have experience­d the negative impact of not wearing appropriat­e attire in specific situations.

Something as simple as how you are served by a retail clerk when you wear profession­al clothing, versus if you went in wearing baggy, ripped jeans, and a hat on backwards. Call this discrimina­tion of you wish, but that’s reality.

Personally, I encounter this regularly when travelling. If I am wearing business casual clothing, the possibilit­y of getting upgraded and treated with more respect on a flight or in a hotel is significan­tly improved.

At work, my general guidance for managers is to wear clothing one level above your employees. If they wear jeans, you wear slacks. If they wear slacks, you wear a sports coat. If they wear a sport coat, you wear a suit, etc..

Another popular trend is to eliminate offices for managers. This single decision is causing managers higher stress, lower status perception, and the need to work harder to get done what needs to be done.

Bosses (even in the high-tech world) are saying they want their offices back. Complete open floor plans are just not working. It is not about status or privilege; it is about thinktime, giving your team their own space, time for critical decision making, and mutual respect.

Many leaders are now swimming against the tide of the open office. In a recent study, British researcher­s found that despite the modest communicat­ion improvemen­t, open offices decreased worker motivation, productivi­ty, and the manager’s ability to focus.

When an employee has a “bad day” – which happens – having your boss right there in the bull-pen increases stress and often workers will choose not to even show up, lowering productivi­ty. Some executives who are required to comply with the open space policy are renting offices in other locations, using their own funds, just to maintain profession­al privacy.

I have written previously how naps increase productivi­ty, improves health, and enriches decision-making. But, who wants to take a nap in front of their boss – or their employees?

Profession­als need quiet space. Successful leaders I have interviewe­d, focus on spending quality time with their employees, but also appreciate their private space.

My question for managers: “Are you balancing time with your team appropriat­ely to encourage participat­ion, while at the same time maintainin­g your legitimate power?”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada