The Guardian (Charlottetown)

Will your job be automated?

Seventy per cent of Americans say no

- BY CHRISTOPHE­R RUGABER

Most Americans believe their jobs are safe from the spread of automation and robotics, at least during their lifetimes, and only a handful says automation has cost them a job or loss of income.

Still, a survey by the Pew Research Center also found widespread anxiety about the general impact of technologi­cal change. Three-quarters of Americans say it is at least “somewhat realistic” that robots and computers will eventually perform most of the jobs currently done by people. Roughly the same proportion worry that such an outcome will have negative consequenc­es, such as worsening inequality.

“The public expects a number of different jobs and occupation­s to be replaced by technology in the coming decades, but few think their own job is heading in that direction,” Aaron Smith, associate director at the Pew Research Center, said.

More than half of respondent­s expect that fast food workers, insurance claims processors and legal clerks will be mostly replaced by robots and computers during their lifetimes. Nearly two-thirds think that most retailers will be fully automated in 20 years, with little or no human interactio­n between customers and employers.

Americans’ relative optimism about their own jobs might be the more accurate assessment. Many recent expert analyses are finding less dramatic impacts from automation than studies from several years ago that suggested up to half of jobs could be automated.

A report last week, issued by the education company Pearson, Oxford University, and the Nesta Foundation found that just one in five workers are in occupation­s that will shrink by 2030.

Many analysts increasing­ly focus on the impact of automation on specific tasks, rather than entire jobs. A report in January from the consulting firm McKinsey concluded that less than 5 per cent of occupation­s were likely to be entirely automated. But it also found that in 60 per cent of occupation­s, workers could see roughly one-third of their tasks automated.

That suggests workers will need to continuall­y upgrade their skills as existing jobs evolve with new technologi­es.

Just 6 per cent of the respondent­s to the Pew survey said that they themselves have either lost a job or seen their hours or incomes cut because of automation. Perhaps not surprising­ly, they have a much more negative view of technology’s impact on work. Nearly half of those respondent­s say that technology has actually made it harder for them to advance in their careers.

Contrary to the stereotype of older workers unable to keep up with new technology, younger workers - aged 18 through 24 were the most likely to say that automation had cost them a job or income. Eleven per cent of workers in that group said automation had cut their pay or work hours. That’s double the proportion of workers aged 50 through 64 who said the same.

The Pew survey also found widespread skepticism about the benefits of many emerging technologi­es, with most Americans saying they would not ride in a driverless car. A majority are also not interested in using a robotic caregiver for elderly relatives.

Thirty per cent of respondent­s said they think self-driving cars would actually cause traffic accidents to increase, and 31 per cent said they would stay roughly the same. Just 39 per cent said they thought accidents would decline.

More than 80 per cent support the idea of requiring selfdrivin­g cars to stay in specific lanes.

 ?? MICHAEL CIAGLO/HOUSTON CHRONICLE/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? In this Aug. 18 file photo, a new security robot, nicknamed ROD2, drives toward Daniel Webb as it patrols the sidewalks and parking garage at River Oaks District in Houston.
MICHAEL CIAGLO/HOUSTON CHRONICLE/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS In this Aug. 18 file photo, a new security robot, nicknamed ROD2, drives toward Daniel Webb as it patrols the sidewalks and parking garage at River Oaks District in Houston.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada