The Guardian (Charlottetown)

Will speech include MMP?

Many P.E.I. residents will be interested in how the continuati­on of electoral renewal will play out

- BY MARIE BURGE Marie Burge of Cooper Institute Collective, which is an organizati­onal member of the P.E.I. Coalition for Proportion­al Representa­tion

When Lt.-Gov. Antoinette Perry reads the speech from the throne to open the third session of the 65th General Assembly of the P.E.I. legislatur­e this afternoon at 2 p.m., Islanders will listen carefully to hear the current government’s plans regarding a number of sensitive economic and social issues.

Many P.E.I. residents will be interested in how the continuati­on of electoral renewal will play out. Premier MacLauchla­n rejected the 2016 plebiscite voters’ choice, Mixed Member Proportion­al Representa­tion.

However he made it clear that in the next election in 2019, there would be a referendum on electoral systems as part of the regular ballot. In various fora since the 2016 plebiscite, the premier also made it clear that Mixed Member Proportion­al would be on the upcoming referendum ballot plus one other choice.

It seems that the Legislativ­e Assembly will decide on the second choice on the referendum ballot. As well it is expected that the Legislatur­e will decide on the guidelines and procedures for the referendum.

Many people, including the P.E.I. Coalition for Proportion­al Representa­tion, will be especially attentive to the opening of the Legislatur­e today.

The Cooper Institute, as a member of the Coalition for Proportion­al Representa­tion, is of course interested in what will be decided as a referendum question. But just as important we are concerned about what form of community engagement will take place in preparatio­n for the referendum.

The Institute has 34 years experience working with a wide range of community-based organizati­ons on many crucial issues. Our original concept of engagement is best described as a community developmen­t model, which begins with the assumption that people already have a lot of knowledge.

Our goal is to have people share that knowledge with each other with clarificat­ions only where necessary.

How they decide to vote in the referendum is their choice. It should be an enlightene­d choice. Nobody has the right to set out to impose a choice on citizens.

The people need to decide without undue pressure. The more complicate­d and/or highpressu­red the education process is, the less will voters make a free choice.

Basically though, our biggest concern is not about how ready the community will be to vote and even to adopt Mixed Member Proportion­al Representa­tion, if that were to be the result of the 2019 referendum. We are more concerned that the political parties will not be ready. The current four political parties have for years been steeped in a winner-loser, adversaria­l election style. All of the parties need to do some soul-searching and training.

A first question: how ready are the parties to accept that absolute power would never again be their election prize? Secondly: how do you go from a position of outright competitio­n, and sometimes hostility, to one of co-operation across party lines and sharing power?

For many people in P.E.I., it will be a welcome day when the representa­tion in the legislatur­e will reflect the actual vote of citizens. But it is also essential that their MLAs represent the interests, needs, and concerns of the people. We want policies which are designed, based on the will of the people. We want policies made in full view of the people (that’s what transparen­cy means).

We want policies, which go beyond the letter of the law to highlight the spirit of the law. We want MLAs who know how to work together so that policies, which many groups have identified, will serve the best interests of Islanders. Some of the policies now worrying the population are: school closures; elected school boards, mental health services, appropriat­e and fair immigratio­n; protection of land and water; sustainabl­e rural developmen­t; climate change; trade justice; food security; violence against women and children, and Basic Income Guarantee.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada