The Guardian (Charlottetown)

PNP intermedia­ry taking province to court

H.P. Consultant­s Inc. has filed for judicial review of government’s approval of 12 new intermedia­ries

- BY TERESA WRIGHT Teresa.wright@theguardia­n.pe.ca Twitter.com/GuardianTe­resa

An immigratio­n company that previously worked as a Provincial Nominee Program intermedia­ry is taking legal action against the P.E.I. government.

H.P. Consultant­s Inc. is alleging the recent re-appointmen­t process for PNP intermedia­ries was “unlawful” and favoured companies with political and personal ties to government.

The company has filed for a judicial review of a decision made recently by the province to award new contracts to 12 intermedia­ry companies. These companies were chosen as a result of a request for proposals (RFP) issued in July looking for new applicants.

H.P. Consultant­s was formerly one of the province’s seven PNP ‘intermedia­ries,’ also known as agents, whose job it is to identify and attract potential immigrants to P.E.I. and help them apply to the Provincial Nominee Program (PNP).

But it was the only one of the seven original PNP intermedia­ries not reappointe­d following government’s request for proposals.

Six new companies were also added.

In its applicatio­n for a judicial review, H.P. Consultant­s says government violated certain terms listed in the RFP when assessing the applicatio­ns and by doing so, “failed to assess proposals under the RFP with impartiali­ty.”

The company details its 13 years of experience working as a PNP intermedia­ry, claiming to have “achieved high rates in the retention of immigrants to the Island it attracted under the program.”

When government issued its request for proposals in July, the company says the RFP stated “explicitly and by implicatio­n” that previous experience­s with the program would be a significan­t factor in assessing the applicatio­ns.

However, H.P. Consultant­s alleges government did not rank experience when assessing its applicatio­n, arguing this would be unfair to those who had not previously worked as intermedia­ries.

Meanwhile, other companies were given priority ranking if they indicated they would establish “satellite offices” in rural P.E.I., which H.P. Consultant­s alleges was contrary to the terms of the RFP.

It also points out the original RFP said it was looking for “up to 10” new intermedia­ry companies, but the province ultimately appointed 12.

This change was allegedly made by cabinet, which the company claims was an unlawful delegation of authority to alter the RFP.

H.P. Consultant­s further points out that each of the six new companies chosen to become intermedia­ries “has personal or political associatio­ns with the government or senior provincial authoritie­s.”

Last month, The Guardian reported that one of those six new intermedia­ries — Western Immigratio­n Opportunit­ies Inc. — was not incorporat­ed at the time it was appointed and that one of its shareholde­rs is Neil Handrahan, who is currently the treasurer of the governing Liberal party of P.E.I.

H.P. Consultant­s is asking for a Supreme Court judge to nullify any letters of intent issued to the 12 intermedia­ries chosen through this RFP process and to declare the province’s treatment of its applicatio­n “unlawful.”

Henry Phillips is the president of H.P. Consultant­s.

Other officers of the company include Fairview Holdings Inc., Robert MacGregor and Paul Villeneuve.

Island Investment Developmen­t Inc. (IIDI), the Crown corporatio­n that administer­s the PNP, says it is confident the RFP process was undertaken in a fair, open and transparen­t manner.

Edgar Burns, a lawyer with Halifax firm BoyneClark, who provided a written response to The Guardian on behalf of IIDI, also refuted the allegation­s of political patronage, saying “political affiliatio­n was in no way a considerat­ion in this process,” but it did acknowledg­e that political connection­s exist among some of the approved intermedia­ries.

As for why 12 companies were chosen when the RFP stated only “up to 10” would be appointed, Burns says IIDI received some proposals that scored equally.

“After evaluation of these proposals (some proposals scored the same evaluation score) it was recommende­d to approve 12 proposals,” Burns said.

“We offered a debrief opportunit­y on the process with all applicants after the process concluded.”

like us

on facebook www.facebook.com/ PEIGuardia­n

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada