The truth about bugs as food
Selling cricket flour is a sign that the protein wars in Canada have reached a new level.
Loblaw, the largest food distribution company in the country, is now selling cricket flour. The product isn’t new — specialty stores have been selling it for a few years. But Loblaw is the first major retailer to sell the product under its private label.
This decision was not made lightly by Loblaw. A growing number of consumers are looking for protein alternatives beyond the meat trifecta of beef, pork and chicken.
About 80 per cent of the world’s population eats bugs regularly.
In the Western world, however, it’s still not mainstream, mainly due to the creepy-crawly factor.
However, we’ve all eaten bugs, deliberately or not. Food safety research shows that bugs regularly get into the human food chain, through grains, vegetables, fruits or other means. Food safety perfection is just an ideal but bugs aren’t harmful.
Other research suggests that over a lifetime, the average human will eat up to eight bugs just while sleeping. Bugs surround us, whether we like or not.
But to accept them as an integral part of our food supply chain is still a psychological stretch.
For Loblaw though, it’s about health and sustainability, and the case for crickets is very compelling. A 2.5-tablespoon serving has 90 calories and 13 grams of protein. It also contains enough vitamin B12 to carry you through the day. Per kilogram, crickets contain as much protein as pork. The University of Oxford published a very compelling study on the nutritional value of crickets versus meat products. Measuring protein content, vitamins, sugar and fat, crickets end up ahead in most categories. Insects are better at converting feed to protein than larger livestock.
While some studies point out limitations around cricket consumption, scientific consensus is building. It’s not surprising then, that Loblaw has been looking at this for a few years.
Loblaw is testing consumers’ curiosity and willingness to explore new dietary options. But they’re not exactly giving the product away. When launched, the retail price point was almost $16 for a 113-gram bag. The price dropped to $14 just a few days later.
Given how inexpensive cricket production is, margins are likely high because of the shelf space sacrificed to stock this item.
Cricket flour can be used in smoothies, yogurt, soups, oatmeal and baked goods, among many other things. And with its neutral flavour, it won’t spoil the taste.
But Loblaw is bold to put a picture of a cricket on a package with its prized President’s Choice brand logo.
From our perspective, crickets don’t look appetizing. But neither did lobster at one time. Lobsters, once known as the cockroaches of the sea, are now consumed as a delicacy. Demand is also up for weirdlooking species like octopus. While bugs have yet to make it into mainstream Canadian cuisine, they’re regularly included in meals in countries like China, Mexico and Thailand.
Loblaw’s primary motivation is to enhance efficiencies by managing protein differently across global protein supply chains. Even if several studies dispute the nutritional value of insects and may not see them as a viable source of protein, animal protein remains under severe pressure, as pro-livestock factions know only too well. Loblaw is hedging against the questionable future of animal protein.
Health Canada will release a new food guide and based on principles disclosed last fall by the public regulator, it seems that Canadians will be invited to think twice about their level of protein consumption, specifically from meat and dairy.
Many consumers have probed livestock practices and have concerns around the environmental footprint, ethics and health value of meat.
If crickets or other insects are to become part of the dietary way of life in Canada, it would probably be as a potent supplementary ingredient, not necessarily as a raw food product. It’s highly unlikely that steaks, chicken wings or pork chops will be replaced by a plateful of crickets any time soon. But ingredients sourced from the start of the food chain are starting to take their place in the retail market.
There are no longer any short answers to economically relevant production models in food. But with sound research, we’re slowly accepting the fact that protein intake can come in several forms.