The Guardian (Charlottetown)

Excluding the public from the public interest

- Philip Callaghan is a member of the Coalition for the Protection of P.E.I. Lands

Loopholes in the P.E.I. Lands Protection Act are tools used by larger corporatio­ns to get around the law. Loophole defined by Webster is an ambiguity or omission through which the intent of the text may be evaded. The advertisin­g guidelines establishe­d by IRAC to provide the opportunit­y for Islanders to acquire P.E.I. land pursuant to the Lands Protection Act contains a very large loophole. Section 4 of the Administra­tive Guidelines for Land Acquisitio­n states as follows:

“Notwithsta­nding the general applicatio­n of the advertisin­g requiremen­ts, these requiremen­ts may be waived in those cases where: it has been demonstrat­ed to the Commission (IRAC) that the acquisitio­n would not be prejudicia­l to the public interest. For example, acquisitio­ns of property as part of an initiative having significan­t economic benefit for the province and where the requiremen­t to advertise the property might prevent the project or activity from going forward.”

This loophole gives the right to government to determine the public interest behind closed doors. This becomes particular­ly true when the economic benefit is deemed to be significan­t. One would think this would be the time when the public should be engaged in the decision process, not sidelined.

The purpose of the Lands Protection Act is to regulate the amount of land held by persons and corporatio­ns. If property can be sold, especially property deemed to be significan­t to the economy, without members of the community being aware, does this not undermine the purpose of the law in the first place. This loophole should be deleted. The failure to close this and other loopholes allows for the land to be controlled in fewer and fewer hands.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada