The Guardian (Charlottetown)

Lawsuit is ‘noise’: government counsel Government, defendants make arguments in appeal

- STU NEATBY

Counsel for defendants named in a $150-million lawsuit, related to the P.E.I. government’s failed e-gaming initiative, variously described the lawsuit as “outrageous”, as “noise” and as having “no merit” during an appeal hearing on Wednesday.

Wednesday’s hearing related to the appeal of a 2019 decision by Supreme

Court Justice Gordon Campbell, which dismissed the lawsuit brought about by Capital Markets Technology Inc. against the P.E.I. government and 14 other defendants. This was the second time Campbell had dismissed a lawsuit brought about by CMT against the provincial government.

Jonathan Coady, counsel representi­ng the provincial government and nine of the defendants, referred to Campbell’s lengthy decision several times in his submission­s.

Coady referred to The

Signal and the Noise, a book by American statistici­an Nate Silver. Coady said the book’s title refers to signals, which refers to truth, and noise, which refers to distractio­ns.

"In a court of law, we have to focus on the signals, the admissible evidence,” Coady said.

“When we do that in this

case, it is my submission there is no reviewable error and this does not raise any genuine issues that require trial.”

In his decision, Campbell stated counsel for CMT had not produced an affidavit from Gary Jessop, a lawyer and director of CMT. Jessop was a signatory to a 2012 memorandum of understand­ing between Innovation P.E.I. and CMT.

A central claim of the CMT lawsuit is that the MOU was breached by several government officials and others.

Coady referred to the lack of affidavits from Jessop in the CMT filings.

Coady also disputed an accusation by John W. McDonald, counsel for CMT, accusing former premier Robert Ghiz of deliberate­ly deleting emails of other government officials, including his former chief of staff Chris LeClair.

Coady said a form signed by Ghiz, which authorized the deletion of LeClair’s email account, was a standard practice for all former civil servants once they left office. He also said the account was deleted in 2011, before the MOU was signed.

“So the action that he took was before the MOU was even a glimmer in anyone’s eye?” asked Court of Appeal Justice David Jenkins. “That’s correct,” Coady said. Leigh Youd, counsel for lawyer Gary Scales, who was retained by the Mi’kmaq Confederac­y of P.E.I. related to the e-gaming initiative, said Scales was not an employee of the provincial government during the time period in question.

He also said Scales knew nothing about the MOU agreement when it was signed.

Youd called the allegation­s made in the lawsuit “outrageous”.

Gavin Tighe, counsel for both William Dow, a lawyer who formerly represente­d Innovation P.E.I., and Tracey Cutcliffe, a former government relations specialist, made similar statements.

Tighe also said case law has establishe­d that the tort of misfeasanc­e can only be levelled against public officers and that their conduct must be proven to both be wrongful and to have harmed the plaintiff.

Tighe said the evidence did not establish this.

“The unrefuted evidence from both Cutcliffe and Dow is that neither one of them were elected officials,” Tighe said.

“They’re not only without merit. They’re hurtful,” Tighe said of the allegation­s.

Greg Temelini, counsel representi­ng defendant Steven Dowling, said his client had pursued a securities investigat­ion into CMT’s activities in the fall of 2012. Dowling is a director with the Department of Justice and Public Safety. The 2012 investigat­ion resulted in a settlement in which CMT admitted to improperly selling securities.

Temelini argued that the accusation of misfeasanc­e of public office was a strange claim to make of Dowling, due to the admission of wrongdoing by CMT.

“This isn’t a parking ticket. It demeans the office of the superinten­dent of securities to say otherwise,” Temelini said.

In response, CMT’s counsel argued that the evidence he has presented raised issues of accountabi­lity of government officials.

A decision on the appeal is expected in the coming months.

 ??  ?? Coady
Coady

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada