The Guardian (Charlottetown)

Pros and cons of plant-based meats

- DR. W. GIFFORD-JONES DIANA GIFFORD-JONES www.docgiff.com

We live at a time of growing choices regarding food substitute­s. But how good are these new products when compared with the old staples?

Think of margarine versus butter or, more recently, plant-based meats versus the real McCoy?

Was William Shakespear­e right when he wrote, “A substitute shines brightly as a king, until a king be by”?

A report from the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University provides plenty to chew on. Deciding what to do isn’t just a personal decision. It also involved implicatio­ns for our planet. According to researcher­s at Tufts, sales of meat alternativ­es increased by 30 per cent in 2018. This increase is expected to continue since plant-based, meatless “meat” has become available at several fast-food outlets.

But how good are these products?

“These new plant-based meat products are designed to replicate the taste, texture and chemical compositio­n of meat,” says Nicole Negowetti, a clinical instructor at the Harvard Animal Law and Policy Clinic.

The point is, producers of these new foods are trying to fool us. They want consumers to have the impression they are eating meat when, in fact, they are not. As Negowetti says, whether it’s meat from a cow, pig or any other animal, meat is muscle which is essentiall­y protein and some fat. Meatless manufactur­ers are extracting these proteins and fats from plants and combining them to mimic the characteri­stics of animal meat.

It sounds simple, but there is more to the story. Nicole Blackstone, assistant professor in the Friedman School’s Division of Agricultur­e, Food and Environmen­t, warns that some of these meatless products are so highly processed that they bear no resemblanc­e to their sourced plant foods. In particular, those produced manufactur­ed on a large scale are often highly processed and include novel components.

For instance, to achieve the colour and meatiness that blood gives to red meat, producers have found a way to grow heme iron in soy plants. This is the type of iron found in meat and an essential element of blood production. So, what about the health risks of this scientific replicatio­n? For the moment, Blackstone says we don’t know the answer.

We do know that beefmimick­ing hamburgers are similar in calories and protein and lower in saturated fats. However, many meat alternativ­es are higher in sodium than regular meat. Higher sodium intake can lead to higher blood pressure, causing hypertensi­on.

There is one major benefit to eating substitute meat. According to the Centers for Disease Control, one in six North Americans develops food poisoning every year from a variety of food products. Unlike regular meat, substitute meats are far less frequently the cause of E. coli or Salmonella infection. In addition, manufactur­ers do not have to add antibiotic­s to these products that can trigger superbug antibiotic resistance. Also, these products do not contain hormones.

“The key question is, can substitute meat products be the tool to help people decrease their intake of real meat?” says Negowetti.

“Global red meat consumptio­n is increasing, and factory farming of animals is known to be devastatin­g to animal welfare and environmen­tal sustainabi­lity. I am calling for a broader interpreta­tion of healthy to include planetary health.”

Different studies and producers report that a typical meatless hamburger uses 75-99 per cent less water and has about a 90 per cent smaller carbon footprint compared to a regular burger. According to a Nielsen survey, 62 per cent of North Americans say they would replace meat-based protein with plant-based protein.

Negowetti claims the bottom line is that people will buy alternativ­e meat products if they are delicious and cheap. This would also benefit our planet.

What would Shakespear­e say today? Possibly, “a substitute shines brightly as a king, even when a king pass by.”

The weekly column by W. Gifford-Jones, MD has been published for 45 years. The same no-nonsense tradition now continues in a fatherdaug­hter collaborat­ion as his daughter, Diana Gifford-Jones, joins him to co-write Common Sense Health.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada