The Hamilton Spectator

Defence chief defines ‘combat’

- MURRAY BREWSTER OTTAWA —

The country’s top military commander took pains Friday to explain his view of what does — and does not — constitute combat, a definition Gen. Jonathan Vance insists is not custom-made to suit the Trudeau government’s political needs.

Vance, Canada’s chief of the defence staff, is an expert in military combat, he said — and what the Liberal government is planning to do to help beat back the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant isn’t it.

So-called “advise-and-assist” missions are new enough that some have trouble with the concept, Vance said — a veiled reference to the NDP, which insists on characteri­zing the rescored special forces mission in northern Iraq as a combat mission.

Internatio­nal operations fall under a “broad lexicon — and some people may be uncomforta­ble with the lexicon, and that’s too bad,” Vance told the annual Conference of Defence Associatio­ns Institute meeting in Ottawa.

“We are using a technique that is relatively new, borne of the lessons of Afghanista­n. A ‘train, advise and assist’ mission clearly falls into the noncombat realm, whereas a combat mission is largely distinguis­hed by the fact we are the principal combatant.”

Canada’s participat­ion in airstrikes against ISIL targets, a mission launched by the previous Conservati­ve government in 2014 and ended by the Liberals earlier this week, was indeed a combat mission, he added.

The question of whether Canada has been involved in a combat mission has been an open one, prompting heated debate after it was revealed that Canadian special forces trainers sometimes engaged in firefights with ISIL extremists and helped Kurdish forces by guiding in airstrikes. That debate only got hotter last March when special forces soldier Sgt. Andrew Doiron was killed in a friendly-fire incident last March.

The fact the political debate has not moved forward appears to be a growing source of frustratio­n within the defence establishm­ent.

Vance pointed to the peacekeepi­ng and peace support operations of the 1990s — mostly in the Balkans — where troops were engaged in firefights, but the missions were never described as combat operations.

“If we are attacked, we defend ourselves. So fighting can erupt and in that context we don’t fall into the trap of describing it as anything else other than a peace support operation,” he said.

Vance said he believes advise-and-assist missions are likely the future for many western militaries.

 ?? FRED CHARTRAND, THE CANADIAN PRESS ?? Gen. Jonathan Vance denies he’s tailoring combat definition to suit Liberals.
FRED CHARTRAND, THE CANADIAN PRESS Gen. Jonathan Vance denies he’s tailoring combat definition to suit Liberals.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada