The Hamilton Spectator

Canada’s GDP has biggest monthly decline

Alberta fires main factor in 6.4 per cent drop in natural resources sector: Statistics Canada

- ANDY BLATCHFORD

The Alberta wildfires torched the Canadian economy in May, driving the country into its worst one-month performanc­e since the darkest days of the Great Recession seven years ago.

On Friday, Statistics Canada’s latest reading for real gross domestic product showed a contractio­n for the month of 0.6 per cent, a number that revealed the extent of the economic fallout caused by the blazes that roared through the heart of oilsands country.

The dip in the economy was a little deeper than expected. Economists had predicted real GDP to recoil 0.4 per cent, according to Thomson Reuters.

The number, Canada’s worst monthly figure since real GDP fell 0.8 per cent in March 2009, supported the already-dismal growth prospects for the second quarter.

The wildfires led to the evacuation of Fort McMurray, destroyed more than 2,000 structures and shut down key crude operations.

The decline in real GDP for May was largely due to a 22 per cent drop in non-convention­al oil extraction, which Statistics Canada said was the sector’s lowest level of output since May 2011.

The agency said the disaster was the main contributo­r to the 6.4 per cent drop in the overall natural resources sector and the 2.8 per cent decline in the output of all goodsprodu­cing industries.

Manufactur­ing output was also hurt. The industry was knocked back 2.4 per cent in May in large part due to a 15 per cent drop in output at petroleum refineries, which was created by a shortage of crude oil.

Even without the negative consequenc­es of the fires, the economy still had disappoint­ing results in other sectors.

Excluding the decline in nonconvent­ional oil extraction, real GDP moved backward in May by 0.1 per cent, Statistics Canada said.

CIBC chief economist Avery Shenfeld pointed to a weakness in capital spending by businesses, a letdown in exports and a decline in constructi­on.

“There were fires raging in Alberta, but the rest of the economy wasn’t so hot,” said Shenfeld.

But he suggested the feeble number for May should be put into perspectiv­e.

“Excluding that one (non-convention­al oil) sector, GDP was down 0.1 — that is not the worst month we’ve seen,” he said.

“You have to, when there’s a single event like that, strip it out because we know that (oil) production will partly rebound in June and then be back more materially in July. So, a one- or two-month disruption isn’t really indicative of the trend.”

The May headline number for real GDP followed a slim economic growth reading of 0.1 per cent in April. Before that, the Canadian economy limped through contractio­ns of 0.2 per cent in March and 0.1 per cent in February.

After growing at a sturdy annual rate of 2.4 per cent in the first quarter, the economy is widely expected to churn out a significan­tly worse result in the second quarter.

Krishen Rangasamy, senior economist with the National Bank, said Friday that due to a poor real GDP, numbers in recent months mean the economy will likely contract by between one and 1.5 per cent in the second quarter.

But Rangasamy did highlight a bright spot in the May data: the resilience of the services sector, which grew by 0.3 per cent.

“Fortunatel­y for Canada, there is still a buoyant services sector, which hit an all-time high after registerin­g its eighth consecutiv­e gain in output,” he wrote in a research note to clients.

Earlier this month, the Bank of Canada predicted the impact of the wildfires to fuel a contractio­n of one per cent in the second quarter.

 ?? CANADIAN PRESS FILE PHOTO ?? The Canadian economy took a big hit in May because of the Alberta wildfires, Statistics Canada said Friday.
CANADIAN PRESS FILE PHOTO The Canadian economy took a big hit in May because of the Alberta wildfires, Statistics Canada said Friday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada