The Hamilton Spectator

Laudable reforms marred by loopholes

- Howard Elliott

The Wynne government’s political advertisin­g and election finance reform proposals are a mixed bag. They do a number of things right, but don’t deal with two of the most important issues that tarnish government credibilit­y and increase citizen cynicism. Let’s first look at what the proposals do right. They reduce personal annual donation limits from just under $10,000 to $1,200. The Liberals first proposed a cap of $1,525, but wisely saw the benefit of further reductions. This change will go some distance toward reducing the risk of wealthy citizens buying influence, or being perceived as doing so.

That reduction will put a dent in all party treasuries, so to offset that the reforms call for increasing the pervote public subsidy parties receive from a planned $2.26 to $2.71. Based on 2014 results the formula would see the Green party getting $630,000, the NDP receiving $3.1 million, the PCs $4.09 million and the Liberals $5.06 million.

Also, under the new regulation­s in Bill 201, corporate and union advertisin­g would be banned. And government advertisin­g would be banned in the 60 days leading up to an election. There would be a $100,000 ceiling on third-party advertisin­g during an election campaign and a $600,000 cap on advertisin­g in the six months leading up to an election.

So far, so good. These are sensible reforms that will go some distance to restoring a degree of credibilit­y around election financing and advertisin­g. In fact, this reform package could be a home run for a government badly in need of one. Except … There are two big loopholes remaining. First, the government did not ban cash-for-access fundraisin­g. That’s where affluent individual­s and companies can write big cheques (think $10,000 and up) and gain access to senior government ministers, including the premier. The Liberals have a propensity for this sort of event and, in fact, it was them being outed on a couple of them that led to demands for reform and the government’s commitment to clean house. This has to be stopped. The optics of big corporatio­ns wining and dining senior government officials, then bidding on projects in many cases, is polar opposite of common sense and public opinion. It smacks of the sort of entitlemen­t many people think the Liberals live by.

Then there’s the partisan advertisin­g debacle. The Liberals were wrong to gut the Government Advertisin­g Act by removing the auditor general’s authority to block partisan pitches paid for with tax dollars. As we’ve said in this space before, this is a credibilit­y killer on the key issue of integrity and transparen­cy.

It’s not too late to fix these glaring shortcomin­gs. The Wynne government must not make the mistake of letting them end up in the final legislatio­n.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada