The Hamilton Spectator

British baby Charlie Gard dies, was centre of legal battle

- DANICA KIRKA, JILL LAWLESS AND LEONORE SCHICK

LONDON — Charlie Gard, the terminally ill British baby at the centre of a legal and ethical battle that attracted the attention of Pope Francis and U.S. President Donald Trump, died Friday. He was one week shy of his first birthday.

Charlie suffered from a rare genetic disease, mitochondr­ial depletion syndrome, which left him brain damaged and unable to move his limbs or breathe unaided.

A family spokespers­on, Alison Smith-Squire, confirmed Charlie’s death on Friday, a day after a judge ordered that he be taken to a hospice for his final hours.

“Our beautiful little boy has gone, we’re so proud of him,” his mother Connie Yates said in a statement.

Charlie’s parents raised more than 1.3 million pounds ($1.7 million) to take him to the United States for an experiment­al medical therapy they believed could prolong his life. But Charlie’s doctors at Great Ormond Street Hospital in London objected, saying the treatment wouldn’t help and might cause him to suffer. The dispute ended up in court. Charlie’s case became a flashpoint for debates on the rights of both children and parents, on health-care funding, medical interventi­ons, the responsibi­lities of hospitals and medical workers and the role of the state.

After months of legal battles, High Court judge Nicholas Francis ruled Thursday that Charlie should be transferre­d to a hospice and taken off life support after his parents and the hospital f ailed to agree on an end-of-life care plan for the infant.

Under British law, it is common for courts to intervene when parents and doctors disagree on the treatment of a child. In such cases, the rights of the child take primacy over the parents’ right to decide what’s best for their offspring.

The case made it all the way to Britain’s Supreme Court as Charlie’s parents refused to accept decisions by a series of judges who backed Great Ormond Street. But the Supreme Court agreed with the lower courts, saying it was in Charlie’s best interests that he be allowed to die.

The case caught the attention of Trump and the pope after the European Court of Human Rights refused to intervene. The two leaders sent tweets of support for Charlie and his parents, triggering a surge of grassroots action, including a number of U.S. right-to-life activists who flew to London to support Charlie’s parents.

The interventi­on of two of the world’s most powerful men made the case a talking point for the planet.

The heated commentary prompted Judge Francis to criticize the effects of social media and those “who know almost nothing about this case but who feel entitled to express opinions.”

In the end, the increased attention did little for Charlie.

His parents gave up their legal battle on Monday after scans showed that Charlie’s muscles had deteriorat­ed so much that the damage was irreversib­le. “Mummy and Daddy love you so much Charlie, we always have and we always will and we are so sorry that we couldn’t save you,” his parents wrote when they announced their decision. “We had the chance but we weren’t allowed to give you that chance.

“Sweet dreams baby. Sleep tight, our beautiful little boy.”

 ?? THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Chris Gard and Connie Yates with their son Charlie Gard at Great Ormond Street Hospital in London.
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Chris Gard and Connie Yates with their son Charlie Gard at Great Ormond Street Hospital in London.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada