The Hamilton Spectator

Killer’s widow compensate­d for brother’s conduct as executor

- STEVE BUIST sbuist@thespec.com 905-526-3226

The brother of child killer Andrew Osidacz has been ordered to personally pay his sister-in-law more than $150,000 in legal costs for his “reprehensi­ble” conduct as the executor of his dead brother’s estate.

Justice Thomas Lofchik of Hamilton blasted Michael Osidacz in a scathing decision released recently for his “reckless and egregious conduct” over a 10-year period as he tried to prevent Julie Craven from gaining access to her estranged husband’s estate.

During a court-ordered visit in 2006, Andrew Osidacz stabbed his eight-year-old son Jared to death. He then drove to Craven’s Brantford home covered in blood, told her what he had done and held a knife to her throat until he was shot dead by police.

Earlier this year, Craven was awarded $565,000 from the estate, including aggravatin­g and punitive damages.

The case had dragged on for a decade and Michael Osidacz had been using money from the estate to fund the litigation against Craven, throwing up “every conceivabl­e roadblock and unnecessar­y defence” possible, according to Lofchik.

“Michael Osidacz was acting not as an estate trustee but personally, in carrying out a vendetta against Julie Craven in order to limit any compensati­on she received from the estate,” Lofchik wrote in his decision.

The judge called Michael Osidacz’s actions 10 years of “harassment” to deny Craven’s legitimate claims for justice and rightful compensati­on.

“He subjected an impoverish­ed, grieving mother who had just nearly been killed by the perpetrato­r of the heinous murder of her eightyear-old son to a litigation ‘strategy’ of denial, deflection and ultimately blame that had no basis in the will, the evidentiar­y record or reasonable­ness,” Lofchik determined.

“I find that his reckless, totally irrational and totally unreasonab­le conduct and personal confrontat­ions with the plaintiff rise to the level of ‘reprehensi­ble’ conduct.”

Osidacz attempted to portray himself as “a person of limited means” as he fought against having to repay the legal costs, but Lofchik wasn’t buying the argument.

The judge noted Osidacz was forced to reveal during the trial that he lived in a very large, mortgagefr­ee house in Brantford built with his own money.

Osidacz then had to admit he owns seven rental properties, “five of which were mortgage free and had been for more than 10 years,” Lofchik wrote.

Lofchik ordered Michael Osidacz to personally pay Craven $141,310 plus HST in costs and another $10,000 in disburseme­nts.

Attempts to reach Osidacz for comment through his lawyer were unsuccessf­ul.

 ?? HAMILTON SPECTATOR FILE PHOTO ?? Julie Craven, with her father, John Craven, in 2009, was awarded $565,000.
HAMILTON SPECTATOR FILE PHOTO Julie Craven, with her father, John Craven, in 2009, was awarded $565,000.
 ??  ?? Andrew Osidacz
Andrew Osidacz

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada