The Hamilton Spectator

Exclusivel­y rural Flamboroug­h ward is coming apart

Ward 14 Coun. Robert Pasuta unhappy with OMB ruling

- ANDREW DRESCHEL

Farmers may feed cities but based on the Ontario Municipal Board’s ward boundary ruling it looks like cities politicall­y devour farmers.

The most lamentable change in the board’s redrawing of Hamilton’s electoral map is the eliminatio­n of the current Ward 14 in west Flamboroug­h, effectivel­y shutting down the one voice around the city council horseshoe which speaks exclusivel­y for rural residents.

Under the plan, the ward will be wiped out and partitione­d between Ancaster and Dundas, reshaping the unique agricultur­al community into a mixed urban-rural precinct. In its stead a new ward will sprout on the Mountain.

Ward 14 comprises more than one-third of Hamilton’s total land mass and accounts for a big portion of the $1 billion plus economic activity which agricultur­e annually contribute­s to Hamilton’s economy.

For the past 11 years Coun. Robert Pasuta, a farmer himself, has been the voice of that community, which since amalgamati­on has become part of the flavour and fabric of the

city.

Pasuta’s updates to council on the state of asparagus, corn, and soybean crops are a quirky but restorativ­e reminder of how singularly blessed Hamilton is, how just a short distance from the choking traffic and concrete of the big city the elemental forces of nature still call the tune that people’s lives and livelihood­s dance to.

The weather and soil will remain if the board decision stands. An independen­t political voice for farmers will not.

Word of the board decision knocked the wind out of Pasuta. He’s got his legs back under him now. If legal grounds permit, he firmly supports appealing the ruling.

“It’s not about me; it’s about the people,” he says.

Unfortunat­ely for the people of west Flamboroug­h, there simply isn’t enough of them in the rational eyes of the board to survive as a standalone political entity.

Throughout the ward boundary debate — with all its dithering, poor judgment, and feeble compromise­s by city councillor­s — Ward 14 has been a poster child for reform.

Though geographic­ally the largest ward, demographi­cally it’s the smallest with about 17,000 people. Ward 7 on the central Mountain, on the other hand, has about 62,000 residents. But both wards have one councillor, one vote.

The board’s decision to enforce the boundary changes recommende­d by the city’s own consultant­s but ignored by council has ended that disparity (and other less dramatic ones) in the name of greater parity.

In making its ruling, the board concluded that council was set on preserving the postamalga­mation status quo that maintains the split of urban versus suburban/rural interests, plus the minority interests of keeping Ward 14 exclusivel­y rural.

But the board argued that times change and council’s “overarchin­g emphasis” on protecting a rural voice on council needs to be expanded to recognize other community and minority interests.

For example, the board heard arguments that the protection of rural interests has the potential to dilute the voting power of visible minorities in inner city wards.

According to a McMaster University researcher, inner city Wards 2 and 5 have visible minority population­s of 27 per cent and 20.5 per cent respective­ly compared to Ward 14 which has a visible minority population of three per cent.

Therefore, the researcher suggests, visible minorites in the inner city may be more poorly represente­d than nonvisible minorities in the rural suburban wards.

It’s an interestin­g talking point which certainly broadens the OMB principle of protecting communitie­s of interest beyond traditiona­l geographic, historical and socioecono­mic grounds. But unless visible minorities vote as racial blocs the relevance isn’t clear.

After all, we’re not talking American politics here. Isn’t a Hamiltonia­n, a Hamiltonia­n? Isn’t the ballot box colour blind?

Regardless, the board is “satisfied” that the rural voice will continue to enjoy effective representa­tion after Ward 14 is split up.

Perhaps it will. But surely a sense of unity and community feeling will be diminished when one voice becomes two.

 ??  ??
 ?? GARY YOKOYAMA, THE HAMILTON SPECTATOR ?? The OMB has redrawn Hamilton’s electoral map eliminatin­g Ward 14, reshaping the unique agricultur­al community into a mixed urban-rural precinct, Andrew Dreschel notes.
GARY YOKOYAMA, THE HAMILTON SPECTATOR The OMB has redrawn Hamilton’s electoral map eliminatin­g Ward 14, reshaping the unique agricultur­al community into a mixed urban-rural precinct, Andrew Dreschel notes.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada