New view of an auto’s national content could ease NAFTA jam
WASHINGTON — NAFTA negotiations are approaching a new phase of talks after early rounds marked by acrimony, inflexibility and finger-pointing. It’s the search for solutions. Negotiators gathered at an informal session in Washington this week are discussing ways to work around a main impasse of the talks so far: a U.S. demand on auto parts deemed unfeasible by Canada, Mexico and the industry.
Now, the other countries are asking the U.S. whether there might be a way to rework the proposal in a manner palatable to everyone, while still achieving America’s goal of bolstering domestic auto production.
It’s an effort to get a head start before talks enter a critical stage next year: Rounds are currently scheduled only into March, Mexico and the U.S. have national elections thereafter and President Donald Trump has threatened to start the withdrawal process to get a quick deal.
One Canadian official said that a spirit of problem-solving has permeated this informal round.
“The mood has lightened a bit since the Mexico round (last month),” he said. “It was a bit acrimonious.” The main goal this week, aside from chipping away at less-controversial chapters, is to start exploring solutions for the auto provisions, a key priority for a Trump administration elected on a promise to strengthen domestic manufacturing. The Canadian side thinks that goal can be achieved by moving away from the traditional method of calculating the content of a car. For instance, the current NAFTA says that a car’s pieces must be 62.5 per cent North American to avoid a tariff and the U.S. called for a rampup to 85 per cent, plus a U.S.-specific 50 per cent requirement, with virtually no adjustment phase-in period, to the dismay of other parties.
But what if the formula were completely overhauled?
Canada is raising the idea of a new calculation method that takes into account the full cost of a vehicle, including the most valuable components of modern cars — which, increasingly, are new digital technologies, lightweight composite materials and other intellectual property, for which the United States is a world-leading hub.
“Evaluating the entire value ... rather than some of the components that are currently spelled out. (Things like) digital inputs,” is how one official explained it.
“It’s important to recognize that what goes into a car has changed since NAFTA was signed.”
The drastic transformation in the sector was outlined in a paper this year by the government-and-industry-funded Center for Automotive Research in Michigan, which described how a technological revolution is already underway, spurred by autonomous cars; new fuel-efficiency standards; improved safety and computer connectivity.
It said the accelerated rate of innovation will last at least three decades. It estimated that while mild steel and high-strength alloys made up 80 per cent of a car’s materials in 2010, that fell to barely 60 per cent in 2015; will fall to barely 30 per cent in 2020; barely 20 per cent in 2030; and less than 10 per cent in 2040.
A Canadian auto-parts representative said these changes are partly driven by tough new international fuel standards.
Flavio Volpe said companies are spending hundreds of billions of dollars to double fuel efficiency through everything from lightweight materials to internal components: “Start-stop technology. Hybrid technology. Batteries, electric, fuel cell... Material sciences.”
He said the U.S. is currently a hotbed of these technologies. And he said it might make sense to design incentives to keep production of emerging technology on this continent. He called the tracing requirements in NAFTA a tool designed for the cars of 1994.
“I think we have to have a fresh look at the way that works,” Volpe said.
“(So) can you devise a formula that captures the hundreds of billions of dollars currently being spent to meet advanced fuel-efficiency and safety regulations? If you can, then we can all negotiate the numbers (later).” There might not be much time. Trump has repeatedly said he might start withdrawing from NAFTA to press the other countries into making concessions.