The Hamilton Spectator

The nickel and diming of Ontario taxpayers

- CHRISTINE VAN GEYN

A new year in Ontario always comes with a few predictabl­e staples: fireworks, champagne, a countdown to midnight, and petty increases to taxes and regulatory fees by the provincial government.

We’re not talking about big-picture changes to income taxes. There is no significan­t change there. A two-child, singleinco­me family earning $60,000 per year will have no change to their income taxes.

Rather, it’s a death-by-a-thousand-cuts of fee increases in just about every area of life. As surely as the ball drops in Times Square on Dec. 31, fees climb up each Jan. 1.

For example, licence plate fees have increased from $25 to $27, camping fees are up $0.25 for this year, and hunting and fishing licence fees are increasing by anywhere from 2.3 per cent to 4.5 per cent.

These are small increases taken individual­ly, but the nickel-and-diming of taxpayers is especially stinging in a province like Ontario, where the cost of living has increased dramatical­ly over the last 10 years. Consider increases to the cost of electricit­y and housing.

With respect to housing, real estate developmen­t fees that are automatica­lly escalated each year on Jan. 1 are part of the problem. With the new year has come automatic increases to the Building Code Commission applicatio­n fee, the Building Materials Evaluation Commission applicatio­n fee, the Line Fences Act appeal fee, and the Minister’s Ruling applicatio­n fee. Registrati­on and renewal fees for building officials, independen­t designers, sewage system installers, design firms, and Registered Code Agencies are all automatica­lly escalated each year, as well.

When the average price of a detached home in Toronto is hitting $1.4 million, politician­s should consider how the plethora regulatory fees on real estate developmen­t impact the cost of housing. Consumers are largely unaware of these costs, but they ultimately end up paying for them as part of the final price of the home.

Government fees that increase automatica­lly with the rate of inflation, like those developmen­t fees, are referred to as “escalator taxes,” and politician­s love them. They take a one-time reputation­al hit on a new fee or fee increase, but the fees will continue to increase each year without the need to bring a bill to Queen’s Park to approve the subsequent increases. This is significan­t for a provincial government that has been hammered on making everything in Ontario more expensive. The more tax and fee increases they can hide, the better off they are politicall­y.

So it makes political sense for them to bring in even more new escalator fees, like a new escalator fee on quarries and the new four-year escalator on certain farming fees.

New and existing escalator fees should be called out, because cabinet ministers should take responsibi­lity for the decisions they make that increase costs on the people that elected them.

Accountabi­lity demands that when costs to the public go up, there is an elected official, rather than a faceless bureaucrat, associated with that increase. Because the more politician­s can get away with these types of fee increases, the more they will rely on them. And ultimately, the more it will cost the taxpaying public.

Christine Van Geyn is Ontario director for the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, a citizens’ advocacy group fighting for lower taxes, less waste and accountabl­e government. The CTF is funded by free-will, non tax-receiptabl­e contributi­ons.

Escalator fees should be called out, because cabinet ministers should take responsibi­lity for the decisions they make that increase costs on the people that elected them

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada