Safety, not profits, should come first

Paying Canadians for plasma donations carries too many risks and should be stopped

In this spell of frigid weather, Health Canada has found itself in some hot water. The trouble has been years in the making — since at least 2013. That was when Canadian Plasma Resources, a profit-seeking company that pays individuals for their blood plasma, sought to open its first location.

A recent media exposé has raised questions, not just about CPR’s business model and what it means for the health of Canadians, but also about the surprisingly close relationship this private company has with Health Canada, the public agency tasked to regulate it.

Among its many roles, Health Canada is responsible for enforcing laws and regulations that govern the collection of blood and blood products (including blood plasma). Canada’s blood supply is collected and maintained by the independent, nonprofit agency, Canadian Blood Services. Voluntary donations are collected in the public interest and make their way back to patients in Canadian hospitals through life-giving blood transfusions.

Though both CPR and CBS are regulated by Health Canada, and share similar names, CPR is playing an entirely different game.

Rather than collecting voluntary, unpaid blood or blood plasma destined for hospitals and patients in Canada, CPR is a private company that pays for plasma collection to generate profit. They do so by appealing to some of the most impoverished and vulnerable in our society. For example, in Ontario, CPR attempted to open clinics beside a methadone clinic and homeless shelters. One was intended to be in Hamilton.

Once plasma is collected and processed by CPR and companies like it, it is turned around to be sold to customers around the world. Clients typically include large drug companies that incorporate blood plasma into pharmaceutical products. These products are then sold back to patients and hospitals. No laws are being broken here — but there remain some very serious and significant concerns with this approach.

CPR’s paid donor model has actually resulted in declining voluntary donations for “regular,” non-plasma blood donations to Canadian Blood Services in Saskatoon, where CPR currently operates.

Aware of this collateral damage, CBS even warned Health Canada about their compromised supply and asked for “a pause of support for commercial activity” while developing a plan to secure voluntary plasma donations. Health Canada chose to ignore this warning, and instead approved CPR’s application to open its second clinic in Moncton, N.B. There are also well-founded safety concerns. The practice of for-profit plasma collection is widespread in the United States and has been called into question there. There have been reports of questionable adherence to screening guidelines, including individuals lying to pass medical tests. In one instance, a desperate paid donor reported, “I can’t eat if I don’t pass.”

In Canada, CPR has chosen to open its storefronts in communities stricken with poverty who already bear a high burden of illness. It is not unreasonable to question how this business model might heighten safety concerns. The World Health Organization has said as much, recommending collection from low-risk, voluntary unpaid donors. Canada’s own tainted blood scandal and the resulting Krever Inquiry led to very similar conclusions, recommending donors of blood and plasma not be paid for donations, except in rare circumstances.

So why, despite warnings raised by CBS, the WHO and the lessons of our own domestic scandal, did Health Canada so readily approve CPR’s license to operate?

As media sources show, Health Canada officials were in direct communication with senior lobbyists regarding the CPR’s business, expansion and even public relations plans, including challenges with Ontario’s proposed ban on paid plasma.

Prior lobbying interactions with Health Canada were deemed “information sharing” to keep keen officials abreast of CPR’s progress.

All of this begs the question; what is going on at Health Canada and to whom do they consider themselves accountable? As the public regulator responsible for the nation’s health, it is the well-being of Canadians that should come first, not the bottom-line of private enterprise.