’60S SCOOP: $800 million not enough for Indigenous children forced into foster care, survivors tell Ottawa

Federal goverment’s proposed $800-million settlement does not go far enough, group says

OTTAWA — A group representing survivors of the so-called ’60s Scoop says the federal government’s proposed $800-million settlement does not go far enough.

The government failed to adequately consult those who experienced forced adoptions before it announced the compensation package in October, said Duane Morrisseau-Beck of the National Indigenous Survivors of Child Welfare Network.

Thousands of Indigenous children were taken from their homes by child-welfare agents and placed with non-Indigenous families starting in the 1960s, a practice that stripped them of their culture, language and traditions.

Morrisseau, who is a survivor, said the network will campaign against the proposed settlement and plans to hold rallies in cities across the country on March 16 to demand fair and inclusive compensation.

“We deserve to be heard,” he said Friday. “We feel that this agreement is unfair, unreasonable and not in the best interest of ’60s Scoop survivors.”

The network also took issue with the settlement’s exclusion of Métis survivors and those without legal Indian status or who are unable to prove it.

Sabrina Williams, a spokesperson for Carolyn Bennett, minister of Crown-Indigenous relations, described the settlement as a first step and said the government is committed to addressing the harm suffered by others involved, including Métis and non-status people.

“The Sixties Scoop is a dark and painful chapter in Canada’s history,” she said in an email.

“The government is interested in working with all parties — provinces, territories, Métis leadership, plaintiffs and their counsel — to work towards resolving the litigation outside of the courts.”

Survivor Lesley Parlane said it is irresponsible and dismissive of the government not to take an accurate survey of how many people were affected.

“To proceed without all survivors’ input is unconscionable and is an act of deep injustice,” she said.