The Hamilton Spectator

Reconcilia­tion is only beginning

- DR. LORENZO CHERUBINI

The 2015 Final Report of the Truth and Reconcilia­tion Commission of Canada addressed the context of residentia­l schools in Canada, and accounted for nearly 7,000 heartrendi­ng testimonie­s and statements from survivors, families, and other community members. The voices that inform the report speak to the interconne­cted and interdepen­dent emotional, spiritual, linguistic, and physical aspects of Indigenous peoples’ identities and world views, and the overall destructiv­e force of European encroachme­nt on Turtle Island.

The tone of the report is in some respects both retrospect­ive and relative. In one way, it presents compelling evidence pointing to the ruthlessne­ss of colonial ambition, power and politics. From a different angle, the survivors’ solemn testimonie­s not only underscore their strength and resolve but also invite us all into the broader conversati­on to which we are entrusted. That conversati­on is informed by the Report’s 94 Calls to Action, which endorse approaches to reconcilia­tion that recognize the origins and contempora­ry implicatio­ns of the residentia­l school era. It is a conversati­on, therefore, that must include education; as commission chair Justice Murray Sinclair stated in 2015, “Education is what got us into this mess … but education is the key to reconcilia­tion.”

Further, the realities of missing and murdered Indigenous women, youth suicides, and deplorable living conditions across remote reserves transition the conversati­on from the past to the ineluctabl­e present. It should be recognized that public education, and more precisely kindergart­en-to-Grade 12 educators, have arrived at particular interpreta­tions of reconcilia­tion, just over two years after the commission’s recommende­d calls to action. By inviting students to situate themselves in difficult and sometimes uncomforta­ble spaces, educators have insightful­ly, pragmatica­lly, and incrementa­lly encouraged students to examine aspects of Canadian history that traditiona­lly and largely have been ignored. Especially successful are the many school board administra­tors, principals, and teachers who first positioned themselves in these same uneasy spaces and reflected upon their own interpreta­tion of the historical present. As a result, teachers taking the lead from Indigenous partners and participat­ing in the conversati­on with their students are doing so from more informed perspectiv­es.

Though not necessaril­y experts on the topic of reconcilia­tion, such educators are committed to sharpening students’ critical awareness of power and conflict, as well as advancing students’ acute perception­s of Indigenous peoples’ strength and resilience. The conversati­on becomes more strenuous when one considers the political complexity of teaching, as educators are tasked with increasing­ly diverse responsibi­lities while fulfilling their roles and responsibi­lities during times of unpreceden­ted levels of accountabi­lity. Yet, these educators seek to honour the Indigenous voices that have been silenced for too long and to connect their students to broader social movements. While the conversati­ons manifest differentl­y in each classroom, the commonalit­y rests upon the fact that educators have accepted the responsibi­lity of re-articulati­ng the historical narrative by recognizin­g Indigenous peoples’ victimizat­ion and underscori­ng their unique social, cultural, and epistemic foundation­s.

But the conversati­on about reconcilia­tion is only beginning. These and other initiative­s represent a modest step to “getting out of the mess” and eradicatin­g the legacy of the residentia­l school system. There is concern that the demands placed on teachers will hinder the developmen­t of the respective calls to action. Educators will need to be steadfast and resolute to sustain and advance these and other substantiv­e projects. The provincial ministries of education and the federal offices responsibl­e for First Nations education across Canada will need renewed strategies that are responsive to the inequities and gaps experience­d by Indigenous students. Educators will have to continue to apply their own learning and culturally relevant pedagogy efficientl­y and accurately. By following the counsel of the same elders, Indigenous advisers, and community members who have been instrument­al in nurturing the conversati­ons, principals and teachers will have to facilitate learning opportunit­ies for children and adolescent­s in curiously appropriat­e ways so that the tensions and ambiguitie­s of the past can serve as tools of introspect­ion and heightened awareness.

Perhaps only then will students, as prospectiv­e critical citizens, be willing and able to comprehend how missing and murdered Indigenous women, narratives of youth hopelessne­ss, abhorrent living conditions, disputed treaties, and contentiou­s environmen­tal concerns have embedded meaning, and conversely, how the collective traditions, knowledges, and spirit of Indigenous peoples develop and complement our own experience­s on this land.

Dr. Lorenzo Cherubini is a professor and former director of the Tecumseh Centre for Aboriginal Research and Education at Brock University.

 ?? ADRIAN WYLD THE CANADIAN PRESS ?? Truth and Reconcilia­tion Commission Chair Justice Murray Sinclair .
ADRIAN WYLD THE CANADIAN PRESS Truth and Reconcilia­tion Commission Chair Justice Murray Sinclair .

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada