Human Rights Commission joins sex-ed challenge

TORONTO — An interim sexual education curriculum introduced by Ontario’s Progressive Conservative government discriminates against some students and puts them at greater risk of sexual violence, the province’s human rights commission said Tuesday as it joined a legal challenge of the document.

The interim curriculum, which replaces a modernized version drafted by the previous Liberal government in 2015, discriminates based on sex, sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression, the commission said.

“The children most affected by the changes to the education curriculum are the same children who are at the highest risk of exclusion, harassment and violence,” Chief Commissioner Renu Mandhane said in a statement.

“This is not the safe, welcoming education experience envisioned in the Human Rights Code. We stand with students across Ontario who are using their voice to make sure all students’ human rights are respected.”

Six students’ families filed a complaint with the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario in August, claiming the interim curriculum makes no mention of issues such as gender diversity or the rights of LGBTQ students.

Their lawyers argued that the government’s decision to repeal the modernized curriculum violates the province’s human rights code and should be declared unlawful.

The lead applicant in the case is an 11-year-old transgender student.

The 2015 sex-ed curriculum included warnings about online bullying and sexting, but opponents, especially social conservatives, objected to the parts of the plan addressing same-sex marriage, gender identity and masturbation.

Repealing itwas one of Premier Doug Ford’s key campaign promises, and one of the first things he did after taking office this summer. Last month, the Tories began a cross-province consultation to develop a new sex-education curriculum,.

At the same time the government introduced an interim lesson plan, after repeated requests from educators who sought clarity. Critics said it makes passing mention of the internet and cellphones but largely reverts to the vague language used in the old curriculum last updated in 1998.

“As this matter is before the court, it would be inappropriate to comment further,” said Kayla Iafelice, spokesperson for Education Minister Lisa Thompson

The Canadian Civil Liberties Association and the union representing Ontario’s elementary school teachers have also launched their own legal challenges of the interim curriculum.