The Hamilton Spectator

No one is sitting on the fence in ALCS fan interferen­ce fiasco

- VICTOR MATHER

It was a wild American League Championsh­ip Series game with memorable moments, great batting, fielding and pitching, and a diving catch to end it. But what most people wanted to talk about Thursday morning was a controvers­y in the first inning Wednesday night.

The Houston Astros were already trailing, 2-0, but got a man on in the bottom half of the inning. With one out, Jose Altuve hit a long fly to right that looked like it might leave the park. Mookie Betts of the Boston Red Sox jumped at the wall for the ball, and his glove hit an Astros fan who was also reaching for it. The ball careened back onto the field, but umpire Joe West immediatel­y called fan interferen­ce and ruled that Altuve was out.

The key to the ruling was where the baseball was when the contact occurred. If it was still on the near side of the wall, Betts had to be given his chance to catch it unimpeded. But if it was over the wall, the fan had every right to go for it.

“The spectator reached out of the stands and hit him over the playing field and closed his glove,” West said after the game.

He said it was clear the ball had not yet crossed the railing.

The Astros called for a video review, and while it was underway fans chanted, “Home run.” But West’s ruling was confirmed. Altuve was out. The Red Sox went on to win, 8-6, and take a threegames-to-one lead in the series. Game 5 was on Wednesday night.

A key to the final decision was West’s interferen­ce call on the field. Baseball’s video review rule says: “To change a reviewable call, the Replay Official must determine that there is clear and convincing evidence to change the original call that was made on the field of play.” The replay officials may have considered the call a close one. Had West’s ruling been a home run, that might have been unchanged as well.

Needless to say, opinion was divided on the ruling.

“That was a clear home run,” Astros outfielder Josh Reddick said.

Betts said he was “100 per cent positive” he would have caught the ball were it not for the fan.

The man at the centre of the controvers­y, Troy Caldwell, is an Astros fan.

“I don’t understand even what happened,” he told The Boston Globe, contending he had stayed on his own side of the wall. “I got my hand out, and the ball hit my hand. I never touched his glove. I don’t understand why they said it wasn’t a home run.”

“I’m going to need security to escort me out of here if the Astros don’t come back to win this,” he told The Houston Chronicle during the game.

Caldwell was given a warning after the incident but was not ejected.

Bill James, the baseball statistici­an and a consultant for the Red Sox, said the call was correct: “The fan very clearly DID reach over the fence. The fan right next to him has his hand on the FRONT of the fence — look at it — and is reaching FORWARD so his left hand is forward of the right. The interferin­g fan has his hand at the same level, so it is CLEARLY in the field of play.”

But plenty of fans and media members said they disagreed, contending that the ball was over the wall and that therefore the fan was within his rights to reach for it.

The rule reads: “No interferen­ce shall be allowed when a fielder reaches over a fence, railing, rope or into a stand to catch a ball. He does so at his own risk.”

 ?? FRANK FRANKLIN II THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? A fan interferen­ce ruling negated an apparent two-run home run on a deep fly ball Boston Red Sox rightfield­er Mookie Betts tried to catch on Wednesday night in Houston. The Red Sox won the game by two runs.
FRANK FRANKLIN II THE ASSOCIATED PRESS A fan interferen­ce ruling negated an apparent two-run home run on a deep fly ball Boston Red Sox rightfield­er Mookie Betts tried to catch on Wednesday night in Houston. The Red Sox won the game by two runs.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada