The Hamilton Spectator

More talk, less bullying ...

Police, journalist­s just trying to do their jobs

- PAUL BERTON Paul Berton is editor-in-chief of The Hamilton Spectator and thespec.com. You can reach him at 905-526-3482 or pberton@thespec.com

It began on a dead-end road at the edge of a bean field in rural Elgin County in June 2017.

It ended — finally — this week in a courtroom in St. Thomas, Ont.

Brett and John Hueston, publisher and editor of the Aylmer Express, were acquitted of obstructin­g a peace officer and other crimes allegedly committed when they showed up where police were investigat­ing a death after a car plunged off a cliff into Lake Erie.

The case sparked outrage in the journalist­ic community across Canada at the time, and with good reason. The father and son were merely doing their jobs.

As Ontario Court Justice Glen Donald noted, the whole case could have been avoided if only the officers on site had communicat­ed better with the journalist­s, according a report in the London Free Press.

Too often that is the case when we meet in a tense situation. The police are quite correctly trying to do their jobs and they don’t want the journalist­s in the way. The journalist­s are quite correctly trying to do their jobs and don’t want to be in the way, but they can’t be ordered away completely, and keeping them in the dark merely raises needless suspicions.

I have seen too many journalist­s behave badly to defend them blindly.

I have cringed many times at media scrums, winced during so-called media events, and lowered my head in shame when my colleagues do embarrassi­ng things in the alleged pursuit of a story.

There are, in short, many bad journalist­s who act irresponsi­bly and thoughtles­sly. (And I’m not perfect either, for the record.)

But the vast majority are caring, thoughtful, sensitive, polite, amiable, collaborat­ive, respectful and often helpful, even if they don’t sometimes appear that way.

They believe what they do is important, that freedom of the press should be a guiding principle for everyone — not just journalist­s — in a functionin­g democracy. And they know it is not enough for authoritie­s to promote transparen­cy; they must be seen to be transparen­t.

That wasn’t the case that day near the cliff. Journalist­s are the eyes and ears for a public that is increasing­ly kept in the dark, intentiona­lly or otherwise, by those in presumed power, often the same people who assume secrecy is better than openness, and bullying is better than straightfo­rward communicat­ion.

Police are not the only ones who forget this from time to time, but they are the ones with the power to arrest, and therefore media confrontat­ions with police generate more headlines than others.

Good journalist­s and good police officers know well that this is a partnershi­p, and both have what’s best for the public in mind (although we sometimes interpret that differentl­y).

Unfortunat­ely, events like the one involving the Huestons set these partnershi­ps back for everyone.

The judge this week had some hopeful words on that too: “The Huestons’ arrest and this prosecutio­n could not have helped that relationsh­ip. I’m hopeful that each side to this dispute can find a way forward for the betterment of our institutio­ns and for the longevity for our free and democratic society.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada