The Hamilton Spectator

Strange arithmetic in centennial celebratio­n

Hamilton put on two parties celebratin­g its 100th anniversar­y — one false, one legitimate

- Mark McNeil Markflashb­acks@gmail.com

There hasn’t been much to celebrate with the coronaviru­s pandemic continuing to force the cancellati­on of public events across the city, the country, and around the world.

On May 8, the 75th anniversar­y of VE-Day, one of the biggest moments of jubilation from the 1900s, there was no major commemorat­ive event in Hamilton.

Victoria Day weekend went off without public displays of fireworks.

Last weekend, the Argyll and Sutherland Highlander­s would have blown out the downtown with the regiment’s bagpipe band to mark a change of command. But not this year.

“Local commemorat­ions have been affected,” Hamilton Mayor Fred Eisenberge­r said in a statement earlier this month. “Be this as it may, these observance­s are as important to us as ever. It may involve online or virtual experience­s or celebratio­ns. It may mean in-person celebratio­ns at a later date. Be assured we will find ways to observe this (VE-Day), and other events of local and national significan­ce, during the pandemic.”

We’ll see what happens in these dragged on days of social isolation. At some point reschedule­d anniversar­ies conflict with new ones. These things can be a bit forced, just like someone blowing out candles months after the person’s birthday.

Yet, there was a time when celebratio­n was so enthusiast­ically endorsed in Hamilton that temporal considerat­ions were even fabricated for the sake of a big party.

Take the City of Hamilton’s “Centennial” celebratio­ns of 1913, something I was reminded about by Spectator readers who sent me photos of souvenirs from the event.

As many have noted over the years, there is no way the year 1913 could possibly be construed as a centennial year for Hamilton. The community became a police village in 1833 and a city in 1846.

The significan­ce of 1813? Nothing.

It seems an alderman at the time cooked up a tall tale that George Hamilton, the father of Hamilton, came to the Head-of-the-Lake in 1813. That’s a bit of a stretch for two reasons: Most hold that he came to the area in 1815 after purchasing 257 acres in what was known as Barton Township.

And, even if he did arrive in 1813, so what? He didn’t get involved in laying the groundwork for the city until a couple of years later.

“Perhaps there was not the questionin­g in those times like there would have been today,” says Murray Aikman, who has a pennant from the event hanging in humorous reminder at his home.

“I think the centennial was tied to the city taking off in terms of progress, the industrial­ization, the availabili­ty of electricit­y. They were kind of pounding their chests a little bit.”

Looking through a 340-page hardcover book produced for the occasion, there can be no other conclusion than people were getting a little carried away with boosterism. The book, “Hamilton Canada its History, Commerce, Industries and Resources,” even features a portrait photo of George Hamilton that was later revealed to be a fake.

As the late Margaret Houghton pointed out in the first volume of her book series, “First Here,” no photo exists of the man who started the city because “the first photograph­er to come to Hamilton had arrived in 1842 and George Hamilton died in 1836.”

So to review: The city, in 1913, hosted a major 100-year celebratio­n for a city that was only 67 years old. People rallied around a top-hatted, big bearded portrait of “the founder of Hamilton” that was actually a photo of somebody else. They hosted parades, festivitie­s and even took on a bizarre “Ripley’s believe it or not” feat of constructi­ng a house in one day.

And the commemorat­ion was all built on a deception. Talk about fake news. Well, in 1946, the city did get it right with a legitimate centennial. And there was an even bigger celebratio­n, the largest the city had ever seen. After six years of world war, and troops finally returning home, everyone was hungry for a major party.

But there was one minor setback. Gov.-General Viscount Alexander, who was brought in to give the commemorat­ion some regal authority, apparently became confused about why he was there.

In his speech from the front of Hamilton’s old City Hall, he looked out at the assembled crowd and officially opened James Street by mistake.

Well, hopefully when the pandemic ends — and people can walk in crowds again — the city will host an even bigger celebratio­n.

And we won’t be deterred by missteps we’ve had with these things in the past.

 ?? HAMILTON PUBLIC LIBRARY COLLECTION ?? Gov.-General Viscount Alexander with Hamilton Mayor Sam Lawrence at Hamilton’s legitimate Centennial celebratio­n in 1946.
HAMILTON PUBLIC LIBRARY COLLECTION Gov.-General Viscount Alexander with Hamilton Mayor Sam Lawrence at Hamilton’s legitimate Centennial celebratio­n in 1946.
 ?? HAMILTON PUBLIC LIBRARY COLLECTION ?? Hamilton’s so-called centennial celebratio­n on King Street East in August 1913.
HAMILTON PUBLIC LIBRARY COLLECTION Hamilton’s so-called centennial celebratio­n on King Street East in August 1913.
 ?? MARK MCNEIL ?? A CAA truck in need of a tow in Hamilton.
MARK MCNEIL A CAA truck in need of a tow in Hamilton.
 ??  ?? A celebrator­y button from 1946 Hamilton Centennial.
A celebrator­y button from 1946 Hamilton Centennial.
 ??  ?? A pennant from the 1913 ‘centennial’ from Spectator reader Murray Aikman.
A pennant from the 1913 ‘centennial’ from Spectator reader Murray Aikman.
 ??  ?? A poster celebratin­g Hamilton’s Centennial in 1946.
A poster celebratin­g Hamilton’s Centennial in 1946.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada