The Hamilton Spectator

Experts weigh in on variants and risks of brief interactio­ns

Factors like distancing, masking and ventilatio­n will play into any scenario, regardless of time

- MELISSA COUTO ZUBER

Concerns over more contagious forms of the COVID-19 virus are causing some to wonder if even a very brief interactio­n can cause the illness to spread from one person to another.

Health Canada’s guidelines for contact tracing — the method of identifyin­g potential spread from an infected case — considers someone a close contact if they’ve been within two metres of a positive individual for 15 minutes or more.

But while that timeframe helps contact tracers do their job, it should not necessaril­y guide our behaviour, infectious disease experts say.

That’s because it’s hard pin down what a “safe” length of time for an encounter is, since factors like distancing, masking and ventilatio­n will play into any scenario. Local health regions that have experience­d outbreaks with the new variants are trying to determine if other factors contribute­d to a quicker spread.

While new variants of concern first identified in the U.K., South Africa and Brazil can transmit more easily than other strains, experts say brief interactio­ns with an infected person — whether they have a new variant or not — can be risky under the right circumstan­ces.

“A high-risk exposure is a high-risk exposure,” said Dr. Zain Chagla, an infectious disease specialist with McMaster.

“I don’t think setting some time expectatio­n is necessary to say (transmissi­on) can happen under 15 minutes.”

The 15-minute threshold for contact tracing has remained the same throughout the pandemic and is in line with countries like the U.S.

But it is only a guideline, and some health units in Canada have already tweaked their benchmarks to reflect a more cautious approach.

Dr. Karim Kurji, the medical officer of York Region north of Toronto, says his health unit has used a 10-minute threshold for contact tracers, starting long before the

new variants emerged.

“It’s not just the timeframe we look at, however,” he said. “(We see) whether one or both parties were wearing masks, whether they were talking in low tones or loud voices. There are a number of factors case investigat­ors have to take into account.”

York Region’s total number of variant cases reached 39 this week, all of them the variety first found in Britain. The variant has also been detected in B.C., Alberta and Quebec, and was linked to a devastatin­g outbreak at a long-term care home in the Simcoe Muskoka health unit that has led to 66 resident deaths.

Kurji said some of the people in York Region who got the variantsee­med to have been “quite careful ... and acquired it nonetheles­s,” which could mean brief interactio­ns, like short shopping trips, were to blame.

Kurji said analysis of those 39 cases suggest the “attack rate” — how many people one positive case goes on to infect — could be 70 per cent higher than what his health unit has seen with the current dominant strain. He noted, however, that 39 cases is a small sample size.

The incubation period — the time between infection and potential symptomons­et — has been as low as 18 hours to two days among some York cases, Kurji said. The normal timeframe is five to seven days.

“So if these individual­s were out in the community exposing others ... you can see how exponentia­l the growth could be,” he added.

Chagla says people infected by new variants may have a higher viral load, which could lead to easier transmissi­on and could explain why some of the York cases may have caught the virus in lower-risk environmen­ts.

Dr. Sumon Chakrabart­i, an infectious disease expert in Mississaug­a, says while an accelerate­d rate of infection would be worrisome, the presence of the variants only highlights the importance of public health measures aimed at slowing COVID’s spread.

Chakrabart­i, who’s been involved in contact tracing for the last couple months, says peoplesome­times think they caught the virus in perceived high-risk settings like grocery stores, but may have been infected elsewhere.

Still, he added, a brief interactio­n could “possibly” spread the variant.

“All this fervour happening with the variants, yes, there’s evidence they’re more transmissi­ble, but (transmissi­on) tends to still happen in areas you’d expect — crowded workplaces, households,” Chakrabart­i said.

Chagla says the relatively low prevalence of the variants in Canada will make it easier to pinpoint where spread is happening.

If someone thinks they were infected in a store and another shopper tests positive for the variant, that epidemiolo­gic link will be easy to see, he says, as long as we catch both cases.

Still, experts say, adhering to current public health measures will be the best defence against any form of the virus.

And using a timeframe to determine risky interactio­ns won’t be helpful.

“In reality, five minutes in an elevator with poor ventilatio­n could lead to transmissi­on,” Chagla said. “So there’s nothing magical about Minute 15.”

 ?? FRANK GUNN THE CANADIAN PRESS ?? Experts say even brief interactio­ns with an infected person — whether they have a new variant or not — can be risky.
FRANK GUNN THE CANADIAN PRESS Experts say even brief interactio­ns with an infected person — whether they have a new variant or not — can be risky.
 ?? ST. JOSEPH'S HEALTHCARE ?? “A high-risk exposure is a high-risk exposure,” said Dr. Zain Chagla, an infectious disease specialist with McMaster University.
ST. JOSEPH'S HEALTHCARE “A high-risk exposure is a high-risk exposure,” said Dr. Zain Chagla, an infectious disease specialist with McMaster University.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada