The Hamilton Spectator

What the Biden administra­tion means for trade and Canada

- STEVEN GLOBERMAN Steven Globerman is a resident scholar at the Fraser Institute. © Troy Media

As Canadians watched the U.S. presidenti­al inaugurati­on and the immediate after-effects (which include a scuttled Keystone XL pipeline), many wonder what a Biden administra­tion will mean for Canada.

And for good reason. A dramatic change in governance in the United States will likely have significan­t implicatio­ns for Canada so Canadian policymake­rs in both the private and public sectors should be prepared to respond to the new opportunit­ies — and new challenges.

One area where change is likely is the bilateral trade regime. The Biden administra­tion will almost certainly be more inclined to restore a rules-based regime for trade between the U.S. and its trade partners, including Canada. This implies fewer unilateral actions taken by Washington against exports from trade partners on dubious grounds of “national security,” a common theme of the Trump administra­tion. In a related manner, the Biden administra­tion will likely be more willing to return to trade resolution mechanisms to deal with trade disputes, including restoring the capacity of the WTO to staff trade-dispute tribunals.

A return to a rules-based trade regime is good news for Canadian businesses. Among other things, it will reduce business uncertaint­y faced by Canadian exporters, which should lower their costs of capital and thereby improve the climate for domestic investment.

However, this optimistic perspectiv­e must be tempered by current realities in the U.S., which include a relatively high level of unemployme­nt. Biden has signalled that his economic recovery program will emphasize government purchases from domestic companies and this “buy local” focus may be a major bilateral trade irritant going forward.

A second area of change will be a substantia­l increase in government spending, especially in alternativ­e energy and, possibly, physical infrastruc­ture programs. Canadian constructi­on and alternativ­e energy companies with affiliates in the U.S. might benefit from what will likely be a major spending effort, as those companies would ostensibly be treated as domestic companies under any buy local conditions attached to the government programs.

However, a possible and less favourable indirect effect is that increased U.S. government spending might lead to higher U.S. interest rates. Given integrated financial markets, higher interest rates in the U.S. will put upward pressure on interest rates in Canada.

Changes in the U.S. tax and regulatory regimes can also be expected. In particular, the corporate tax rate will rise, as will personal and capital gains tax rates on upper-income individual­s. By themselves, these changes will make the Canadian tax environmen­t more competitiv­e in a bilateral context. It will also make Canada a more attractive location for “star” immigrants such as scientists and engineers. At the same time, higher corporate and personal taxes, combined with a reimpositi­on of a much stronger regulatory regime, might slow the U.S. economic recovery and indirectly dampen Canada’s post-COVID recovery.

Finally, while the Biden administra­tion raises taxes and reimposes regulation­s in the U.S., Canadian government policy-makers should be more proactive in reducing red tape and high marginal tax rates that have hitherto discourage­d investment and entreprene­urial activity in Canada. Indeed, there may well be an emerging opportunit­y for Canada to become a much more attractive location for innovators and entreprene­urs if policy-makers in this country seize the opportunit­y.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada