The Hamilton Spectator

Our kids need more protection

- JENNA SCHOLZ JENNA SCHOLZ IS THE CO-ORDINATOR OF GOVERNMENT ADVOCACY FOR DEFEND DIGNITY, A NATIONAL ORGANIZATI­ON WORKING TO END SEXUAL EXPLOITATI­ON IN CANADA.

The internet wasn’t designed with children’s safety in mind. Yet in this digital age that’s exactly where they’re spending time — for school, socializat­ion and entertainm­ent.

As you read this, children are being exposed to graphic sexually explicit material that is accessible in seconds.

The government can help prevent this by requiring adult websites to use an age verificati­on process before allowing access to their content. Unfortunat­ely, the Liberal government just turned down an opportunit­y to do so by rejecting an amendment to its Online Streaming Act, Bill C-11, which aims to modernize Canada’s broadcasti­ng legislatio­n by including online undertakin­gs.

Last December the Standing Senate Committee on Transport and Communicat­ions added an amendment during its study of Bill C-11 to ensure children are protected from exposure to sexually explicit material online just as they already are to traditiona­l broadcasti­ng methods such as radio and television.

This amendment passed in the Senate in February and Bill C-11 is back in the House of Commons to assess the changes that were made. However, during the debate on March 8, the Heritage Minister’s Parliament­ary Secretary explained that the Liberal government rejected the Senate’s amendment “to compel online undertakin­gs to implement methods, such as age verificati­on, to prevent children from accessing explicit sexual material” because it “seeks to legislate matters in the broadcasti­ng system that are beyond the policy intent of the bill.” He mentioned that they hoped to address this important issue in upcoming legislatio­n, likely referring to the long-anticipate­d online harms bill. It’s unknown when that bill will be tabled.

While our attention can quickly move on to other issues, let’s pause a moment and realize what’s at stake here. We need the government to follow through and swiftly act on this. Let us not forget who this measure protects and why that protection is necessary. Every delay leads to more children being harmed.

Research shows children are encounteri­ng sexually explicit material at increasing­ly younger ages. For example a study by the British Board of Film Classifica­tion revealed 51 per cent of 11 to 13 year olds had already been exposed. The percentage increased to 79 per cent for older minors. Over half of these minors saw sexually explicit material unintentio­nally.

What are they seeing? Titles such as “Daddy keeps f---ing daughter till she likes it,” “Beach spy changing room two girls,” and “Crying blonde b---- takes rough drilling.”

I would apologize for including the titles above, but if children can stumble upon them, we need to talk about them.

These are typical examples from a study that found that at least one in eight titles on the home pages of popular pornograph­y sites describe sexual violence.

And what is the impact? Two decades worth of peer-reviewed research documents various harms associated with youth being exposed to sexually explicit material. These include confusion over sexual expectatio­ns and consent, mental-health challenges, low self-esteem, body-image insecuriti­es, and being a perpetrato­r or victim of sexual aggression.

Exposure to sexually explicit material poses a serious threat to the well-being of children. We don’t allow children to buy alcohol, gamble or attend sexually explicit films at theatres, yet online they can stumble on adult content in seconds.

We must act to protect children’s rights to life, survival and developmen­t.

In 2021 the United Nation’s Committee on the Rights of the Child published general comment 25, which affirmed children’s rights in the digital space and advocated for age verificati­on as a method to uphold those rights. Australia, France, Germany, the UK, the United States, and the European Union are already acting on age verificati­on. Canadian youth also deserve these online protection­s.

While this won’t be included in Bill C-11, other bills such as Bill S-210 and the anticipate­d online harms legislatio­n can accomplish this.

The path forward will take work, but we must commit to walking it knowing it is both achievable and urgently necessary.

 ?? TORSTAR FILE PHOTO ?? With online porn more and more easily available to kids, we need to do a lot more to protect them, argues Jenna Scholz. She wants adult websites mandated to require age verificati­on before allowing access.
TORSTAR FILE PHOTO With online porn more and more easily available to kids, we need to do a lot more to protect them, argues Jenna Scholz. She wants adult websites mandated to require age verificati­on before allowing access.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada