The McGill Daily

Mapping the brain’s connection­s

New approaches to understand­ing the mind and its disorders

- Fernanda Pérez Gay Juárez

Acouple of months before I moved to Canada to pursue my graduate studies in neuroscien­ce, I stumbled upon a 2010 TED talk titled, “I am my Connectome,” delivered by MIT researcher Sebastian Seung. In the talk, he spoke about how our brain function can be explained in terms of the collection of synapses – the connection­s between neurons – between the billions of neurons in our brain – this is the connectome.

He went on to describe The Human Connectome Project, through which many teams of neuroscien­tists around the world are joining efforts to map the neural connection­s in the human brain, reminiscen­t of the largescale initiative to sequence the entire human genome in 2003. His talk covered the basics on what a synapse is and the enormous number of potential applicatio­ns of this mapping to understand and cure mental disorders. My jaw dropped. Today, three years later, the idea still amazes me, although I’ve grown a little more skeptical.

From genome to connectome

There is a big difference between understand­ing the synapse between two neurons and being able to say “I am my connectome.” Before exploring what the connectome is, and to what extent it can help us to understand the human mind, let’s go back for a moment to the predecesso­r that inspired “the connectome.”

A genome is the entire DNA sequence of an organism. In 2003, fifty years after Watson and Crick first described the double helix structure of DNA, the human genome was completely sequenced and all our genes were mapped through a collaborat­ive internatio­nal effort dubbed The Human Genome Project. Back then, we believed that we had found nature’s recipe for building a human being. Somebody might as well have said: “I am my genome.” But we are not our genomes. We are more than the combined genetic informatio­n from an egg and spermatozo­id. From the moment we develop as an embryo and throughout all of our lives, the genetic informatio­n of our cells can be modified in response to environmen­tal or external factors. These genes go on to code for proteins, and these proteins build all the cells of our bodies. By this the- ory, genes and their environmen­tal modificati­on should be enough to explain our physical constituti­on. However, our personalit­ies, mental faculties, and emotions are a special combinatio­n of genes and environmen­t and they represent a more complex system of specialize­d cellular structure, interactio­n, and function. This is where the connectome comes in.

Connecting with the connectome

Neurons are the cell type which “conduct” messages, allowing our central nervous system to function. A synapse is the place in which these “messages” pass from one nerve cell to another, in the form of electrical or chemical signals. This impulse transmissi­on is the base of our central nervous system’s functions. This implies a difference between the brain and other organs of our body: brain function relies on not only the cellular processes of individual neurons, but also on the interactio­n between neurons which can be far from one another. These circuits of neurons are responsibl­e for our capacity to move in and perceive the world. Our mental functions and identities depend on the connection­s between our neurons.

The term connectome, coined by Olaf Sporns at Indiana University’s Department of Psychologi­cal and Brain Sciences, was inspired by the sequencing of the genome. This term refers to the map of all the neural connection­s within the brain and nervous system. If we see the mind as a system for the flow of informatio­n, the connectome would be the circuitry that keeps this informatio­n moving. Interestin­gly, the connectome is the product of both genetic connection patterns and environmen­tal effects which influence this initial circuitry. Although an important part of our brain’s connection­s is determined by genetics, our connectome­s change over time through learning and experience.

Our brains are elastic: synapses are continuous­ly created and eliminated according to use and experience, thus modifying the connectome. For instance, you have probably made new synapses while reading this article. If we believe that the mind emerges from the brain, and that it is in constant flux, we may also believe, like Seung, that the “connectome” is a determinan­t of who we are.

Explaining mental disorders

The connectome has been seen as a potential pathway to addi- tional insight into mental disorders. When studying some psychiatri­c illnesses, we have to take into account that there are often no visible morphologi­c alteration­s in the brains of people with these conditions. However, the biological theories of many conditions including schizophre­nia, bipolar disorder, eating disorders, and autism today include the concept of “disordered connectivi­ty.”

In the words of Alan Evans , a professor of neurology at Mcgillment­al disorders “arise from brain function disorganiz­ation.” Assessing brain function disorders has historical­ly been difficult because “we didn’t have tools to observe the connectivi­ty and organizati­on of the entire brain as it changes through life.” With the boost in neuroimagi­ng techniques in the last 20 years, this paradigm has changed. We now have machines to observe the structure and function of the brain in real time.

The Human Connectome Project aims to provide answers to these disorders. For instance, Evans uses a variety of neuroimagi­ng techniques to study the brains of infants who have been diagnosed with and without a disorder in the autistic spectrum. Studying the ongoing wiring of infant brains is also important to understand­ing autism as we know that infancy is one of the most important developmen­tal periods in which brain connection­s are being establishe­d, and one in which the brain is most plastic.

To date, the only connectome that has been completely mapped is that of C. elegans, a tiny worm from the nematode family; a team led by South African biologist and Nobel Laureate Sydney Brenner drew a wiring diagram of this organism’s nervous system. We know today that C. elegans has 302 neurons and about 7,000 neural connection­s. In contrast, the human brain has about 100 million neurons and the number of connection­s is astronomic­al. Mapping this number of connection­s is no easy task and the brain sections of the worm can obviously not be applied to the human being. Instead, through the use of new neuroimagi­ng techniques, powerful data- analysis technologi­es, and the constructi­on of open- source databases, the endeavour is starting to seem feasible. In addition, collaborat­ion between internatio­nal laboratori­es in the recent Human Connectome Project, funded by the National Institute of Health in the U. S., have some scientists believing that we may fulfill this goal much sooner than expected.

Are we our connectome?

While the idea of the connectome and Sebastian Seung’s TED talk still amazes me, I cannot help but question his claims that the connectome is the ultimate answer to understand­ing someone’s personalit­y. Eventhough the circuitry of the nervous system is important, it is not the whole story. It is another example of focusing on the “where” things happen while forgetting the “how” a recurring weakness of neuroscien­ce more broadly. The processes and the kind of informatio­n being conveyed by individual connection­s and groups of synapses are also fundamenta­l. In the case of C. elegans, our tiny worm, mapping the entirety of its neural connection­s did not per se explain the whole repertoire of its behaviours. Rather, the diagram served as a starting point for generating hypotheses of functions for the mapped neural circuits, giving rise to many experiment­s that slowly began to explain the organism’s behaviour. Twentyfive years after the worm’s connectome was mapped, scientists now understand how it responds to temperatur­e and mechanical stimulatio­ns, but they’re still using the connectivi­ty diagram to conduct experiment­s, looking to advance our understand­ing of its nervous system and behaviour. If a nervous system composed of 302 neurons is so hard to understand, even with a full map of its connection­s, what can we expect of the human nervous system with its immense number of connection­s? The evidence points one way: We are not merely our connectome­s. However, mapping our connectome­s, in combinatio­n with other approaches to brain and mind functionin­g, seems a worthy endeavour to help us to explain who we are.

Mind the Complexiti­es is a column exploring how scientific knowledge can be applied to the various problems with mental health experience­d in our society. Fernanda Pérez Gay Juárez can be reached at

mindthecom­plexities@ mcgilldail­y.com.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada