The McGill Daily

Concordia faces allegation­s of culture of sexual violence

Professors accused of abusing power to harass female students

- Inori Roy The Mcgill Daily Content warning: sexual assault, abuse of power

Concordia University’s English department, and the larger world of Canadian literature (“Canlit”), is facing allegation­s of a culture of sexual violence, harassment, and abuse of power by professors and writers over the course of several decades. The allegation­s, outlined in a blog post by writer and former Concordia instructor Mike Spry on January 8, do not identify individual­s by name. Instead, they point to a systemic pattern of sexual harassment and exploitati­on of vulnerable young female writers.

Spry states in his blog post that he has “been witness to and made aware of innumerabl­e instances of unwanted affection, groping, inappropri­ate remarks, and propositio­ns” over the course of his relationsh­ip with the university, beginning as an undergradu­ate student 14 years ago, up until his time as an instructor at the university from 2013 to 2015.

“A professor/writer harasses a student, and the student remains silent because they need the grade, or the letter of recommenda­tion, or the internship at the prof’s publisher,” Spry wrote. “Both Concordia and Canlit have fostered inappropri­ate behaviors and environmen­ts that have permeated throughout the community.”

Spry went on to admit that he himself had been complacent in this culture of misogyny – both in remaining silent as his friends and coworkers abused their power, and in participat­ing in this culture of abuse himself.

“I demanded respect and relationsh­ips I felt I was owed. I dated women inappropri­ately younger than me. I treated them poorly,” Spry wrote.

Spry’s apparent role in Concordia’s culture of misogyny was made clearer when, in the days following his post, his former girlfriend Julie Mcisaac wrote her own blog post about her experience­s with misogyny in Canlit. In her post, she described her experience­s with Mike Spry, whom she describes as “deeply sexist.”

“He was an active player who belittled and harassed women writers who only wanted to make the same career moves he benefited from. And now his career is likely to benefit from his speaking out,” she wrote.

While the validity of Spry’s presence in this movement has been called into question, following Mcisaac’s post, his allegation­s have been affirmed by many other writers and graduates of Concordia, most of them women.

In fact, Spry was not the first to write publicly about these experience­s – in a 2014 essay written for The Hairpin, writer Emma Healey discussed her experience of being in a relationsh­ip with a professor at Concordia. At the time, she was 19, and the professor was 34; he pursued her, aggressive­ly and to the knowledge of his colleagues. As Healey describes the relationsh­ip, it was unhealthy and violent.

“While the relationsh­ip itself was consensual, much of what happened within its borders was not,” she said.

Healey is one of many women who have spoken about similar experience­s over the course of the last decade. Most of them have also acknowledg­ed the use of whisper networks as tools of informatio­n, in order to warn their peers about predatory men.

“A story like this is a password. Once you say it out loud, doors start to open,” she wrote.

University responds to allegation­s

Concordia president Alan Shepard announced the launch of a formal investigat­ion, conducted by an external investigat­or, in response to the blog post. This will take place alongside a university-wide task force to ensure campus safety and well-being.

“I’m profoundly sorry that some of our alumni and students have experience­d what they’re reported to have experience­d,” Shepard said in a press conference on Wednesday. “I’ve been reading that it’s an open secret, but it was not an open secret to me.”

Shepard’s comments were surprising to some, given that in 2015, a group of alumni wrote a letter to Concordia’s administra­tion in response to Healey’s 2014 article. In the letter, they described the “toxic” culture at the university and its detrimenta­l impacts on women. The letter was apparently received by the Human Resources department, and no action was taken, according to its writers.

Several reporters present at the press conference asked about the steps taken by Concordia to protect students from predatory professors, but Shepard did not speak to the university’s previous or ongo- ing disciplina­ry proceeding­s.

“All investigat­ions are confidenti­al by law and by our policies,” he said, “and I won’t be able to comment on the specific investigat­ion, or people who have been named on social media.”

Shepard also clarified that while faculty- student relationsh­ips are not banned at Concordia, they fall under the conflict of interest policy, which requires that relationsh­ips of this nature are disclosed to the university. Concordia is currently in the process of expanding their working group and policies around the issues of sexual violence and power imbalance in relationsh­ips.

Since the press conference, two Concordia professors named as alleged abusers on social media have been reassigned pending investigat­ion.

Widespread abuses of power across university lines

Concordia is not the only university to face allegation­s of sexual harassment and violence by faculty members, and a culture of “open secrecy.” Mcgill has been plagued with allegation­s of sexual violence by professors for the last several years.

Most recently, a professor in the Islamic Studies department was accused of several accounts of sexual harassment and abuse of power: stickers bearing his name and allegation­s surroundin­g his conduct have been found across the campus throughout this academic year.

When asked about these allegation­s, Principal Suzanne Fortier said, “When it comes to access to informatio­n, there are certain things that are to be kept private. You will not hear about investigat­ions […] the absence of informatio­n does not mean the absence of investigat­ion.”

Then, in December, a dentist at the Faculty of Dentistry was accused of sexually assaulting one of his patients in November of 2016. The woman who experience­d the assault expressed feeling disappoint­ed and neglected by the university’s response to her allegation­s, stating that she did not feel supported or believed by the administra­tors investigat­ing her case. No outcome was publicised in that investigat­ion.

Mcgill Prominent professors implicated in tell- all posts about abusive power dynamics and sexual harassment has not commented on either of these allegation­s, or the existence of whisper networks amongst women students on campus. Despite allegation­s of sexual harassment or abuse of power by several prominent professors at the university, the administra­tion has not publicly initiated any efforts to protect its vulnerable students.

“[Spry] was an active player who belittled and harassed women writers who only wanted to make the same career moves he benefited from. And now his career is likely to benefit from his speaking out.” —Julie Mcisaac Healey is one of many women who have spoken about similar experience­s over the course of the last decade. Most of them have also acknowledg­ed the use of whisper networks as tools of informatio­n, in order to warn their peers about predatory men.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada