The McGill Daily

Sexism in Science Zero Point Five

The Bias Against Women in Physics

- Margaret Bruna Sci+tech Writer

On September 28, 2018, Alessandro Strumia, a theoretica­l physicist at the University of Pisa, gave a talk at a conference held by CERN (European Organizati­on for Nuclear Research) in Geneva. His presentati­on argued that the field of physics has become discrimina­tory towards men, and unfairly favours women. His presentati­on was considered highly offensive by the audience and organizati­on committee. Strumia has since been suspended from working with CERN.

The main issue that listeners took with Strumia’s claims was that most of his statements were blatantly false. Women in physics often experience strong cultural bias and gender-based discrimina­tion. However, the harmful impact of Strumia’s presentati­on isn’t isolated to this one incident. To a lot of women in the field, the problem of workplace bias is a reality of daily life. Scientists like Strumia will argue that the incredible underrepre­sentation of women in Physics isn’t discrimina­tory, because “physics [was] invented and built by men. It’s not by invitation.” When discussing the presentati­on, Maude Bédard, a U2 Physics undergradu­ate said, “what sucks is that it’s not surprising.” This attitude is unfortunat­e but not uncommon in the field. This leads to women feeling isolated, inexperien­ced, and unwelcomed. It also works to discourage women and femmes from entering the field.

The issues that modern women face in male- dominated fields like Physics, are often subtle and subconscio­us. Barriers are put in place largely by a culture that encourages and celebrates men’s intellectu­al goals but discourage­s the same from women. Tami Pereg-barnea, a Physics professor at Mcgill said, “Very early on, we don’t educate our girls to be smart, we educate them to be nice. We don’t empower them enough.” We often raise men and women in a binary system, where one is treated differentl­y from the other, and taught to enjoy different things. Brigitte Vachon, a Physics Professor at Mcgill and founder of the Canadian Conference for Undergradu­ate Women in Physics, says she noticed the difference in the way her children were treated as early as three years old. She explained that she found her son was compliment­ed on his ability to count or play with Lego, while her daughter was more often compliment­ed on her appearance. She said, “I caught myself doing it. Everybody does that. We talk to children differentl­y.”

This subconscio­us bias in the way men and women are treated only gains strength as children get older and advance into academia. Vachon pointed out that the adjectives used to describe women and men in reference letters are vastly different. Women will be described for their administra­tive capabiliti­es, and men for their innate intelligen­ce; “She’s working really hard, she’s delivering, she’s organized,” as opposed to, “he’s brilliant and intelligen­t.” Pereg-barnea noted that she “didn’t get a single request from female undergradu­ate students to do a project with me. But men find it ok to suggest that they come here to talk about my research, even when they know nothing about it.”

As women in western culture, we will often internaliz­e the biases we grew up with. This can lead to a lack of assertiven­ess; women find themselves being nonconfron­tational and unassuming in their field. According to a study on gender difference­s in Science, Technology, Engineerin­g, and Mathematic­s (STEM), reported by Statistics Canada, “women are always less likely to choose a STEM program, regardless of mathematic­al ability. The Program for Internatio­nal Student Assessment (PISA) is a test which evaluates 15 year old students on their reading, math, and science capabiliti­es in various countries around the world. Among those who went to university, 23 per cent of women in the three highest categories of PISA scores chose a STEM program, compared with 39 per cent of men in the three lowest categories of PISA scores.”

Imposter syndrome also contribute­s to lower levels of female representa­tion in the field. Described as a feeling of chronic self- doubt and inadequacy despite obvious success, imposter syndrome can often cause women to feel hesitant to participat­e, or feel unwelcome around their peers. This is a feeling common in teachers and students amongst other profession­s. Vachon shared that she is “always very nervous about saying anything or questionin­g people, but [her] male colleagues will not shy away.” Imposter syndrome feeds into a lack of representa­tion in the faculty, and vice versa. Only 13 per cent of the Physics faculty at Mcgill is female. “It’s so intimidati­ng when you don’t have a place in this field. It’s hard to feel like you have a chance when the statistics tell you that it’s so unlikely,” explained Katie Savard, another U2 Physics undergradu­ate. Many students don’t get to learn from women as their professors until later into their degree. PeregBarne­a pointed out, “we still have this image of a scientist, which isn’t necessaril­y a woman.”

Underminin­g the abilities of women in the field has been normalized, and is often done subconscio­usly. The fact that the experience­s of women are often subtle and not immediatel­y apparent to men makes it difficult to describe or point out specific problemati­c behaviors. It seems that many males in the undergradu­ate program don’t notice the barriers their female classmates face. Women can experience a fear of being misunderst­ood, or being told they’re overreacti­ng, and many often notice that men will get defensive when these problems are pointed out to them. “You [men] choose to victimize yourselves”, said Chloé Robeyns, a Physics U2 undergradu­ate student. Strumia is a prime and outspoken example. “Men don’t think about these things because it doesn’t happen to them. But if you care about women, you need to start paying attention,” expressed Savard.

The sources used here represent the experience­s of white women in Physics. There are other barriers, such as those faced by queer people, people of colour, and people with disabiliti­es, which also deserve public discussion. Not only is there a lack of representa­tion for these groups, but the barriers facing these groups are often greater than those faced by white women in Physics. To begin changing the field, we must listen to all those who are starting conversati­ons and asking to be heard.

This conversati­on is, however, active and ongoing in the STEM community. Important forums like the Canadian Conference for Undergradu­ate Women in Physics, or the Women in Physics Canada Conference ( being held at Mcgill this summer) are organized to create a welcoming and supportive community for women. “I think one of the key aspects of helping to develop an interest in physics within young women is providing them with some kind of inspiratio­n. Being exposed to more women in Physics, relating to them and hearing their challenges and successes are all so important,” said Juliann Wray, a Physics undergradu­ate student. Conference­s such as these “seem to be filling a need for discussion, for providing a safe space,” said Vachon. Change is happening, and it is now critical to make the discussion bigger and louder. Now more than ever it’s important to foster safe spaces where women are free from the internal barriers caused by external cultural norms that hinder the confidence and feelings of competence in young women. Opening up the conversati­on is a big step in breaking down the barriers women face.

Barriers [for women] are put in place largely by a culture that encourages and celebrates men’s intellectu­al goals but discourage­s the same from women.

“Men don’t think about these things because it doesn’t happen to them, so it’s fine. But if you care about women, you need to start paying attention.”

– Katie Savard, U2 Physics Under graguate Student

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada