The Miracle

Worst humanitari­an crisis hits as Trump slashes foreign aid

-

The world’s largest humanitari­an crisis in 70 years has been declared in three African countries on the brink of famine, just as President Donald Trump’s proposed foreign aid cuts threaten to pull the United States from its historic role as the world’s top emergency donor. If the deep cuts are approved by Congress and the U.S. does not contribute to Africa’s current crisis, experts warn that the continent’s growing drought and famine could have far-ranging effects, including a new wave of migrants heading to Europe and possibly more support for Islamic extremist groups. The conflict-fueled hunger crises in Nigeria, Somalia and South Sudan have culminated in a trio of potential famines hitting almost simultaneo­usly. Nearly 16 million people in the three countries are at risk of dying within months. Famine already has been declared in two counties of South Sudan and 1 million people there are on the brink of dying from a lack of food, UN officials have said. Somalia has declared a state of emergency over drought and 2.9 million of its people face a food crisis that could become a famine, according to the UN And in northeaste­rn Nigeria, severe malnutriti­on is widespread in areas affected by violence from Boko Haram extremists. “We are facing the largest humanitari­an crisis since the creation of the United Nations,” Stephen O’Brien, the UN humanitari­an chief, told the UN Security Council after a visit this month to Somalia and South Sudan. At least $4.4 billion is needed by the end of March to avert a hunger “catastroph­e” in Nigeria, Somalia, South Sudan, and Yemen, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said in late February. But according to UN data, only 10 per cent of the necessary funds have been received so far. Trump’s proposed budget would “absolutely” cut programs that help some of the most vulnerable people on Earth, Mick Mulvaney, the president’s budget director, told reporters last week. The budget would “spend less money on people overseas and more money on people back home,” he said. The United States traditiona­lly has been the largest do- nor to the UN and gives more foreign aid to Africa than any other continent. In 2016 it gave more than $2 billion to the U.N.’s World Food Program, or almost a quarter of its total budget. That is expected to be reduced under Trump’s proposed budget, according to former and current U.S. government officials. In an interview last week with the AP in Washington, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell rejected the proposed cuts to foreign aid. “America being a force is a lot more than building up the Defence Department,” he said. “Diplomacy is important, extremely important, and I don’t think these reductions at the State Department are appropriat­e because many times diplomacy is a lot more effective -- and certainly cheaper -- than military engagement.” The hunger crises in Nigeria, Somalia and South Sudan are all the more painful because they are man-made, experts said, though climate change has had some impact on Somalia and Nigeria’s situations, said J. Peter Pham, the head of the Africa Center at the Atlantic Council. South Sudan has been entrenched in civil war since late 2013 that has killed tens of thousands and prevented widespread cultivatio­n of food. In Nigeria and Somalia, extremist groups Boko Haram and al-Shabab have proven stubborn to defeat, and both Islamic organizati­ons still hold territory that complicate­s aid efforts. If Trump’s foreign aid cuts are approved, the humanitari­an funding burden for the crises would shift to other large donors like Britain. But the U.S.’s influentia­l role in rallying global support will slip. Meanwhile, neighbouri­ng African countries will feel the immediate consequenc­es of famine, experts said. On Thursday, the UN refugee chief said Uganda was at a “breaking point” after more than 570,000 South Sudanese refugees had arrived since July alone. Others fleeing hunger could aim for Europe instead. He described a series of possible consequenc­es. Most likely there will be increased flows of people migrating from Somalia and the vast Sahel region north into Libya, where traffickin­g routes are a valuable source of finance for the Islamic State, he said. Closer to home, people from South Sudan and Somalia seeking food likely will strain the resources of neighbouri­ng countries where political will and goodwill to refugees can be fleeting, said Mohammed Abdiker, director of operations and emergencie­s with the Internatio­nal Organizati­on for Migration. The regional consequenc­es will depend on how the internatio­nal community responds, Abdiker said. Alex De Waal, executive director of the World Peace Foundation, summed up the situation: “Famine can be prevented if we want.” Source: CTV News

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada