The News (New Glasgow)

Reduced pressure

Supreme Court declines to take up ‘Dreamers’ case for now

-

The Supreme Court on Monday rejected the Trump administra­tion’s highly unusual bid to bypass a federal appeals court and get the justices to intervene in the fate of a program that protects hundreds of thousands of young immigrants from deportatio­n.

The decision affecting “Dreamers” means the case will almost certainly have to work its way through the lower courts before any Supreme Court ruling is possible. And because that could take weeks or months, Monday’s decision also is likely to further reduce pressure on Congress to act quickly on the matter.

The ruling on the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, or DACA, wasn’t unexpected.

Justice Department spokesman Devin O’Malley acknowledg­ed that the court “very rarely” hears a case before a lower appeals court has considered it, though he said the administra­tion’s view was “it was warranted” in this case.

O’Malley said the administra­tion would continue to defend the Homeland Security Department’s “lawful authority to wind down DACA in an orderly manner.”

DACA has provided protection from deportatio­n and work permits for about 700,000 young people who came to the U.S. as children and stayed illegally.

Last fall, Trump argued that Obama had exceeded his executive powers when he created the program. Trump gave lawmakers until March 5 to send him legislatio­n to renew the program.

But in recent weeks, federal judges in San Francisco and New York have made Trump’s deadline temporaril­y moot. They’ve issued injunction­s ordering the Trump administra­tion to keep DACA in place while courts consider legal challenges to Trump’s terminatio­n of the program.

The administra­tion was fighting the judges’ rulings in its appeal to the Supreme Court. Yet it has not tried to block the injunction­s that force it to continue operating the program.

Congress has struggled to find consensus on the issue. The Senate stalemated on the matter two weeks ago, leaving any further congressio­nal action in doubt.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada