The News (New Glasgow)

Freedom rings from Tory halls at convention

- Jim Vibert

Apparently, some Canadian Conservati­ves are sick and tired of apologizin­g for being conservati­ve.

It’s unclear exactly why they feel the need to do that, but the man who made the popular declaratio­n at the party’s Halifax convention over the weekend was adamant that he intends to stop. Good on him.

It was suggested here last week that Conservati­ves are hard to define. The convention offered some hints to help with that.

For example, Conservati­ves don’t ban stuff (like pornograph­y) because they don’t like it, and on the same topic, they are certain that the state has no business looking at their browser histories. That sounds right.

“Big government should stay the hell out of people’s lives,” was a sentiment much appreciate­d by Conservati­ves, although an invitation to “go join the NDP... if you want a party that discrimina­tes based on income” wasn’t as well received, perhaps because it came during debate on a motion to offer senior citizens a break on the cost of future convention­s. The motion was defeated.

The last big national Conservati­ve get-together before next year’s election was an eye-opening — and occasional­ly, eye-popping — three days of freedom. Free trade, free speech, free enterprise, free associatio­n, freedom of thought and religion in a free society, where resources flow freely across the land and provinces are free to fight climate change, or not.

Conservati­ve leader Andrew Scheer warmed to the theme in his keynote speech.

“We are not strong and free because we are diverse, we are diverse because we are strong and free,” said Scheer, recasting the age-old chicken-or-egg question.

There were times during the Halifax event when one couldn’t help but ponder why these people want so badly to be the government, when they seem to thoroughly dislike government.

The answer is self-evident: To make it smaller, less intrusive, and a whole lot less expensive.

Conservati­ves hate taxes almost as much as they love freedom.

And the tax they love to hate most is the Liberal government’s carbon tax, regardless of whether it’s a direct tax or disguised as cap and trade.

“We believe that there should be no federally imposed carbon taxes or cap-and-trade systems on either the provinces or on the citizens of Canada. The provinces should be free to develop their own climate change policies, without federal interferen­ce or federal penalties or incentives,” stated a resolution that passed with ease.

The Conservati­ves believe they have a political winner in their opposition to the Liberals’ carbon tax plan, and that the issue that distinguis­hes them from “the other guys” is taxes.

Scheer understand­s his opposition to a carbon tax requires that Conservati­ves find a different answer to the greenhouse gasclimate change problem, and he’s landed on one.

“The best way to reduce global (CO2) emissions is not to shut down Canadian industry. It’s to grow it,” Scheer told delegates.

It seems that by making more aluminum, Canada can make a more meaningful contributi­on to the survival of the planet, despite the fact that producing one ton of aluminum also produces two tonnes of CO2.

But that’s only half the story. In China, manufactur­ing a ton of aluminum produces 17 tons of CO2, ergo, making the stuff here is a win for the environmen­t — a logical leap of Olympian proportion­s.

Policy resolution­s adopted by the party are not binding on the leader and caucus and will not necessaril­y become part of the Conservati­ves’ election platform in the fall of 2019, but it’s a safe bet that a prime plank in that platform will be to axe whatever carbon tax is in place or pending near you.

The extension of an oil pipeline from Alberta to the East Coast, another popular policy resolution, is also likely to find its way into the Tory platform, over virulent opposition in Quebec, where Conservati­ves say they expect to make major gains in 2019.

That Quebec-based opposition helped convince the Trudeau government to kill the Energy East project that would have piped oil from Alberta to Saint John.

Delegates also passed a resolution that one of its advocates promoted as Canada sticking with “people who agree with us” in an outfit he called the “Anglospher­e.” Time will tell how well that plays in la belle province.

Conservati­ves will no doubt revert to the more acceptable if less descriptiv­e, “CANZUK,” which stands for Canada-Australia-New Zealand-United Kingdom, sort of the cream of the old Empire, with notable exceptions.

Jim Vibert grew up in Truro and is a Nova Scotian journalist, writer and former political and communicat­ions consultant to government­s of all stripes.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada