The Niagara Falls Review

Meeting packs chamber

Thundering Waters developmen­t reports not ready; session postponed as larger venue sought

- RAY SPITERI NIAGARA FALLS REVIEW

With the council chamber filled to capacity and with the sounds of even more people chanting “let us in”, Council felt the time and place wasn’t right Tuesday to hold a public meeting about the controvers­ial Thundering Waters developmen­t planned for Niagara Falls.

Politician­s were to receive public input and consider a staff recommenda­tion to direct a final report on the proposed project be brought forward for considerat­ion at a future date.

However, with numerous studies, plans and consultati­ons yet to be finalized, and with a horde of people ready to give their two cents about the developmen­t, council chose to defer the matter until outstandin­g issues are resolved and they can find a more suitable venue to handle a large crowd.

The council chamber was filled with people waiting to hear an update about the project, while the lobby outside was packed with people looking to make their way inside.

The over-flow crowd watched the live broadcast on a television in the lobby.

“Why are we dealing with this tonight and then again when we don’t even have all the reports?” asked Coun. Vince Kerrio.

“It doesn’t seem fair to us, it doesn’t seem fair to the (proponents), it doesn’t even seem fair to the people who are opposed to it because I’m sure they’re going to want to review all of the documentat­ion, review all of the reports … all of the things we don’t have.”

Alex Herlovitch, the city’s director of planning, building and developmen­t, said they had anticipate­d all of the reports and studies would have been finalized by Tuesday’s public meeting.

Why are we dealing with this tonight and then again when we don’t even have all the reports?” Coun. Vince Kerrio

“We have to give notice well in advance. As it turned out, the studies were not completed and we did not receive them in time, but we’d given notice,” he said.

“I suppose we could have cancelled this prescribed meeting, but we thought it was an opportunit­y to gain some input and some insights so that we could make sure that we could address their concerns as we move forward on this process.”

A motion brought forward by Coun. Kim Craitor was approved to defer the public meeting until more of the reports and studies could be finalized, and a larger venue could be found to accommodat­e a bigger crowd.

“You see how many people are really interested and have concerns on either side, and maybe we need to look at a bigger location for the benefit of the public,” he said.

Council also plans to tour the location where the developmen­t is proposed to gain a better understand­ing of the area’s biodiversi­ty.

Coun. Carolynn Ioannoni said she and Craitor have already taken a tour of the area.

“It is beautiful, it’s pristine,” she said. “Once you were in that wetland, you didn’t even know you were in a city. It is something to see and I highly recommend the rest of council go. I learned so much. It was quite an educationa­l experience.”

Coun. Wayne Campbell said he has also toured the site.

The lands in question are 196 hectares (484 acres), said Herlovitch. They are bounded by Oldfield Road, Welland River, Ontario Power Generation Canal, and Stanley Business Park.

He said the proposal is for 115 hectares (284 acres) to be developed for residentia­l, commercial, institutio­nal and employment uses.

In April, council voted to support the future growth of the Thundering Waters area by having a secondary plan prepared for the property. The vote was not to approve the project, but to acknowledg­e the developer’s efforts in doing a number of studies that will help formulate the secondary plan.

Many of those studies, including an environmen­tal impact study, have yet to be finalized.

“The Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry has identified areas in the draft EIS which require additional work or refinement,” said Herlovitch.

Staff has received numerous letters of objection to the project, citing concerns the developmen­t will negatively impact the site’s vast forest and biodiversi­ty. The developers have said they plan to protect and enhance many of the natural heritage attributes on the property.

GR Investment­s Ltd. is behind the massive developmen­t. While GR is based in China, it has a branch in Canada

The project was announced last fall in China during a visit there by Mayor Jim Diodati and Premier Kathleen Wynne. The real-estate arm of the Chinese government is a shareholde­r in the developmen­t.

A First Nations rally was staged in front of city hall last month to save the Thundering Waters forest. The rally called for a moratorium on the project until a transparen­t public process determines the full “social, environmen­tal and economic benefit” of the forest remaining completely intact.

Herlovitch said part of the process thus far has been public consultati­ons.

“We have had a number of meetings with focus groups, as well as open houses,” he said.

“One of those focus groups, for instance, was with a group of environmen­talists, the other with the (surroundin­g) industrial community. We’ve also commenced our discussion­s with First Nations and Metis.”

Herlovitch said he and John Barnsley, the city’s manager of policy planning, are scheduled to go to Brantford this Thursday to continue those discussion­s.

Herlovitch said when it comes to the ongoing dialogue with First Nations and Metis, staff is trying to determine “exactly what their particular interests are.

“I’m aware that they have made requests with respect to the various land treaties ... with the federal government, and their Indigenous rights with respect to those treaties,” he said.

“We’re trying to determine precisely what those concerns are, (and) how we can accommodat­e those through the process.”

Herlovitch said there’s also a number of industrial facilities around the area.

“Many of those industrial operators have come forward, they are concerned about bringing sensitive uses, that is residentia­l land uses, closer to them, which they believe might curtail their activities,” he said.

“There would be mitigation measures required to be taken by the developer.”

Herlovitch said a bridge will need to be constructe­d either over the Welland River or the OPG Canal, which would be a substantia­l investment for the municipali­ty.

“This is project that will be needed before full developmen­t. That bridge crossing would be subject to a separate environmen­tal assessment study.”

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Craitor
Craitor
 ??  ?? Ioannoni
Ioannoni

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada