The Niagara Falls Review

Collectors shouldn’t create knock-offs

- JEFFREY SEGLIN Jeffrey L. Seglin is a lecturer in public policy and director of communicat­ion program at Harvard’s Kennedy School. Send your question to rightthing@comcast.net

A longtime reader from Ohio and her husband used to collect ceramic sculptures. P.A. writes that the company that made the sculptures created a series of villages including Dickens Village, the North Pole, and others, but she points out other companies make similar villages.

Recently, P.A., joined some Facebook pages created by fellow collectors as well as a buy-andsell page for the collection­s. She’s discovered there are a few people who seemingly don’t want to pay the going rate for some of the items, so they are making their own versions.

“Some are moulding the houses out of clay,” she writes. “Others are using 3-D printers. They are trying to create exact copies of the original pieces.”

P.A. points out some are creating the pieces for their own enjoyment, while others are selling their pieces. Still others are making new pieces of their own creation.

The people selling the pieces they’ve made to be “exact copies” are telling prospectiv­e buyers that they are copies and not originals. “I don’t see them as trying to swindle people with fakes,” writes P.A., “although you can really tell the difference pretty easily anyway.”

Sure, the copies might have taken work to create, but that doesn’t take away from the fact they are copying a design that rightfully belongs to someone else. (Painting a replica of someone else’s original artwork also can take a lot of work. Trying to sell that copy infringes on someone else’s creation.)

The ceramic items that others create seem to fall into a different category. If such items are replicas of existing pieces, it seems fair game to go ahead and create them or sell them as long as they are clearly distinguis­hing these as things they make rather than new items released by the company creating the villages.

If the company encourages collectors of the items it sells to make copies, then they should feel free to do so. But it should be left to the company to decide if it wants to do this. (So far, it seems clear from its website that it doesn’t want to.) The copiers instead might consider creating original pieces to sell.

The right thing for collectors is to continue to enjoy collecting whatever villages and pieces they want to collect, but to stop short of creating knock-offs to cut costs or make some extra money.

I don’t see them as trying to swindle people with fakes.” Longtime Ohio reader P.A.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada