The Niagara Falls Review

Ioannoni reinstated to hydro board

- RAY SPITERI rspiteri@postmedia.com

Coun. Carolynn Ioannoni has been reinstated to the board of the Niagara Falls Hydro Holding Corp.

The decision was part of a motion brought forward Tuesday night by Coun. Kim Craitor, which called for Ioannoni to be reinstated “retroactiv­ely” and that “she be made whole for anything that she may have lost because of us removing her from that board.”

In a recorded vote, Craitor and fellow councillor­s Vince Kerrio, Victor Pietrangel­o and Wayne Thomson supported the motion.

Mayor Jim Diodati and councillor­s Wayne Campbell and Joyce Morocco voted against the motion.

Coun. Mike Strange did not attend Tuesday’s meeting, while Ioannoni declared a conflict.

Recently, council also voted in favour of a motion by Craitor for Ioannoni to be reinstated back to the library board as the council representa­tive.

The mayor and each member of council is paid for sitting on the Niagara Falls Hydro Holding Corp. board, the company that owns the city’s share of Niagara Peninsula Energy.

Councillor­s on the library board are not paid.

In June, council voted in favour of a motion brought forward by Kerrio that, in part, asked Ioannoni to resign her seat on council, which she declined.

The motion came after Integrity Commission­er Brian Duxbury’s conclusion that, “on a balance of probabilit­ies,” Ioannoni improperly disclosed sensitive and confidenti­al informatio­n discussed during a Jan. 24, 2017 closed-door meeting to a third party who was not entitled to such informatio­n.

Duxbury concluded Ioannoni breached the city’s Code of Ethics/ Conduct.

Kerrio’s motion, which was unanimousl­y supported (with Ioannoni declaring a conflict), also, in part, called for a 90-day remunerati­on penalty to Ioannoni, and for her to be removed from all council boards and committees, effective immediatel­y.

Ioannoni denied she breached the code, and filed a complaint with the Ontario Ombudsman to investigat­e Duxbury’s probe, believing “key evidence” she provided to Duxbury was not included in his report.

During Tuesday’s meeting, Craitor said he believes council “had gone too far” by removing Ioannoni from the boards, and that council’s decision in June went above and beyond Duxbury’s recommenda­tion.

In his report to council, Duxbury said the municipali­ty may impose either of the following penalties on a member of council or of a local board if the commission­er reports to the municipali­ty that, in his or her opinion, that member has contravene­d the code of conduct: a reprimand or a suspension of the remunerati­on paid to the member in respect to his or her services as a member of council or of the local board, as the case may be, for a period of up to 90 days.

Craitor said he remembers receiving Duxbury’s report “only a couple days” before the June 13, 2017 council meeting, and that the Integrity Commission­er was not open to questions during the session.

Craitor said after the meeting, he contacted some lawyers and prosecutor­s who questioned some aspects of the report.

He said he took issue with the report’s “presumptio­n of guilt.”

Craitorsai­dhe’snotsureho­wmuch Ioannoni is owed retroactiv­ely, but the purpose of his motion “was just simply it shouldn’t have happened in the first place.”

“She’s going to be treated on the basis that she shouldn’t have been removed in the first place, so whatever it is, it is.”

Campbell asked if there are any ongoing investigat­ions involving Ioannoni that “could impact upon our decisions sometime today or in the future.”

City solicitor Ken Beaman said there are ongoing investigat­ions, “but I don’t think that council should look upon the two things as being connected.”

“This is Coun. Craitor’s motion to the situation now and what happened in the past. Future findings should not be used to evaluate the actions of the (past).”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada