The Niagara Falls Review

Quebec’s Liberals stand to gain from certain electoral reform

- CHANTAL HÉBERT Chantal Hebert is a columnist based in Ottawa covering politics. Follow her on Twitter: @ChantalHbe­rt

MONTREAL — Dear Ontario voters, proportion­al representa­tion could soon be coming to a province near you. While electoral reform is not on the radar of the ongoing provincial campaign, the reverse will be true when Quebec goes to the polls in the fall.

Earlier this month, three of the four parties in the National Assembly including the currently leading Coalition Avenir Quebec signed an electoral-reform pact. Should one of them win the Oct. 1 vote, its government would be honour-bound to introduce legislatio­n within its first year in office to move Quebec to a mixed-proportion­al voting system. Under the scenario of an opposition victory, Quebec could presumably vault over British Columbia — where a plebiscite on electoral reform will be held next fall — and become the first province to cross the finish line to a proportion­al voting system.

But did we not just see this move at the federal level and did it not end on an unhappy note for electoral reform proponents?

There are two major difference­s between the Quebec bid to make the fall election the last to be held under the firstpast-the-poll system and Justin Trudeau’s similar undertakin­g in the last federal campaign.

1. Trudeau never sought a mandate to implement a specific voting formula. He was also never particular­ly clear on whether he would submit his proposal to a plebiscite before implementi­ng it. In Quebec next fall, a vote for the CAQ, the Parti Québécois, Québec Solidaire or the Green party will be a vote for a mixed proportion­al system, to be put in place in time for the following election. The implementa­tion of the Quebec pact is not conditiona­l on a referendum.

2. Prior to becoming prime minister, Trudeau had voiced support for a preferenti­al ballot. But none of the other parties would support that formula. Once it became clear the Liberals could not get the reform they wanted, the prime minister ditched his promise.

In any event, in Quebec’s case, a CAQ or PQ government would not have a handy excuse to wiggle out of the pact as its signatorie­s have agreed on a mixed-proportion­al system. That is not to say that the CAQ’s François Legault or PQ’s JeanFranço­is Lisée — should one of the two become premier later this year — would not have cause to pause on the way to changing the system.

The ruling Liberals are offside on the multi-party consensus, but as opposed to the federal Conservati­ves who had cause to fear that a more proportion­al voting system would see them consigned to the opposition benches, Philippe Couillard’s party could well benefit from a reform.

It is not the first-past-the-poll system that has kept the Liberals in power in Quebec for most of the past 15 years but rather the determinat­ion of a growing number of voters to deprive the PQ of a chance to plunge the province into another debate on its political future. That chance could become slimmer under a different voting system.

Quebec’s last majority PQ government had less popular support than the runnerup Liberals. In the election before that in 1994, Jacques Parizeau secured the governing majority he needed to go ahead with a referendum by beating the Liberals 45 per cent to 44 per cent. The Liberals pay a price for the high concentrat­ion of part of their vote. They enjoy massive support among non-Francophon­e voters but that only translates into a small fraction of the province’s seats.

Take the current Quebec polls: province-wide, the numbers suggest the Liberals are highly competitiv­e. But in reality Couillard is in trouble because his party is trailing badly in the francophon­e ridings that will determine the outcome of the fall election. It would be hard to craft a proportion­al voting system that would not be a gift that keeps on giving for the Quebec Liberals.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada