The Niagara Falls Review

Ex-Trump campaign chairman found guilty

Manafort convicted of eight fraud charges; he faces another trial this year in D.C.

- MATTHEW BARAKAT, CHAD DAY AND ERIC TUCKER

ALEXANDRIA, VA. — Paul Manafort, the longtime political operative who for months led Donald Trump’s winning presidenti­al campaign, was found guilty of eight financial crimes Tuesday in the first trial victory of the special counsel investigat­ion into the president’s associates. A judge declared a mistrial on 10 other counts the jury could not agree on.

The verdict was part of a stunning one-two punch of bad news for the White House, coming as the president’s former lawyer, Michael Cohen, was pleading guilty in New York as part of a separate deal with prosecutor­s.

The jury returned the decision after deliberati­ng four days on the charges of tax evasion and bank fraud against the former Trump campaign chairman.

The outcome almost certainly guarantees years of prison for Manafort and establishe­d the ability of special counsel Robert Mueller’s team to persuade a jury of average citizens despite months of partisan attacks — including from Trump — on the investigat­ion’s integrity.

The verdict raised immediate questions of whether the president would seek to pardon Manafort, the lone American charged by Mueller to opt for trial instead of co-operate. The president has not revealed his thinking but spoke sympatheti­cally throughout the trial of his one-time aide and at one point suggested that he had been treated worse than gangster Al Capone.

The more than two-week trial, presided over by the U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III, has captured Trump’s attention as he works to undermine Mueller’s investigat­ion through a constant Twitter barrage and increasing­ly antagonist­ic statements from his lawyer-spokesman, Rudy Giuliani.

But Trump and his campaign were only a small part of Manafort’s trial as jurors instead heard days of testimony about Manafort’s finances and what prosecutor­s say was a years-long tax-evasion and fraud scheme.

Manafort decided not to put on any witnesses or testify himself in the trial. His attorneys said he made the decision because he didn’t believe the government had met its burden of proof.

Manafort’s defence team has attempted to make the case about the credibilit­y of longtime Manafort protege, Rick Gates, who served as the government’s star witness. They have attacked him as a liar, embezzler and instigator of any crimes as they try to persuade jurors that Manafort didn’t wilfully violate the law.

For the prosecutio­n, Gates was the star witness, spending three days before the jury, telling them how he committed crimes alongside Manafort for years. Gates admitted to doctoring documents, falsifying informatio­n and creating fake loans to lower his former boss’s tax bill. He also admitted to stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars without Manafort’s knowledge by filing fake expense reports.

But the government’s case wasn’t all about Gates. Prosecutor­s spent two weeks presenting a meticulous, document-based case before the jury as they sought to prove Manafort used offshore bank accounts to conceal millions of dollars in proceeds from his Ukrainian political consulting from the IRS and later turned to defrauding banks.

Overall, prosecutor­s say Manafort avoided paying more than

$16 million in taxes over several years.

They called carpenters, landscaper­s and clothiers to attest to how Manafort paid for his lavish lifestyle of expensive suits and elaborate properties through offshore wire transfers from shell companies in Cyprus and elsewhere. They also brought in bankers and accountant­s to tell jurors how when Manafort’s foreign consulting income dropped off, he turned to obtaining millions of dollars more in bank loans under false pretences.

And perhaps most importantl­y, the government read from Manafort’s own emails as they laid out their case, including messages where he personally directed withdrawal­s from the offshore accounts he never reported on his tax returns.

Some of other emails admitted into evidence in the case revealed Manafort’s lobbying of Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner on behalf of Stephen Calk, the chairman of Federal Savings Bank. Prosecutor­s say Calk approved $16 million in loans for Manafort — despite several red flags — because Calk wanted a job in the Trump administra­tion.

The emails showed that in the weeks after the 2016 election, Manafort urged Kushner to consider Calk for Secretary of the Army, a position Calk had put at the top of his list in an earlier email to Manafort. Calk also listed seven other senior domestic appointmen­ts and 18 ambassador­ships — ranked in order of preference — that he would accept.

Kushner respond to Manafort’s email by saying, “On it!” But Calk ultimately did not get an administra­tion post.

The trial in Alexandria, Virginia, is the first of two for Manafort. He faces a trial later this year in the District of Columbia on charges of conspiracy against the United States, conspiracy to launder money, making false statements and acting as an unregister­ed foreign agent for Ukrainian interests. He is also accused of witness tampering in that case.

 ?? AL DRAGO BLOOMBERG ?? Paul Manafort, former campaign manager for Donald Trump, exits court in April. Manafort was found guilty Tuesday of eight financial crimes.
AL DRAGO BLOOMBERG Paul Manafort, former campaign manager for Donald Trump, exits court in April. Manafort was found guilty Tuesday of eight financial crimes.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada