The Niagara Falls Review

Legal action against Lundy Manor proceeds

Firm that launched class-action suit against nine homes says it has already alleged ‘gross negligence’

- ALLAN BENNER

New provincial legislatio­n that may protect long-term-care homes from COVID-19 related lawsuits won’t stop an Oakville-based law firm from pursuing nine actions it has filed so far, including a class-action lawsuit filed against the owners of Lundy Manor in Niagara Falls.

But the legislatio­n introduced for first reading on Tuesday — Bill 218, the Supporting Ontario’s Recovery Act — may make it harder to sue by requiring proof of “gross negligence.”

“I’ve been practising law for 35 years now and I’ve never had a case where I’ve had to prove gross negligence … It’s not very well defined,” said Gary Will, a managing partner from Will Davidson LLP.

“And why are you forcing these poor

people to prove to a higher standard? … It’s going to make it very difficult for people to succeed on their claims.”

The legislatio­n if passed would be retroactiv­e to the start of the pandemic on March 17, and require people harmed as a result of exposure to the coronaviru­s to prove gross negligence on behalf of the longterm-care home operator, rather than the current standard, which is ordinary negligence.

“Negligence has been the cornerston­e of our law going back over 100 years,” Will said. “Now they’re saying, you can have a bad result. You can have died because of substandar­d care, but it doesn’t matter because we’re immunizing that bad conduct, or we’re requiring you to prove your case at a higher level.”

Neverthele­ss, he said, his firm will proceed with legal action it has started.

In addition to the suit against Lundy Manor and its parent company Oxford Living, Will’s law firm launched class-action lawsuits against several longterm-care providers throughout the GTA where numerous

COVID-19 related deaths have occurred.

For each of those claims, he said, the law firm did allege gross negligence.

The claims against the longterm-care homes have yet to be proven in court.

The Ontario Health Coalition issued a statement Wednesday calling Bill 218 “morally reprehensi­ble.”

“We are calling for this bill to be defeated,” said the organizati­on’s executive director, Natalie Mehra.

The New Democratic Party also issued statements opposing the proposed legislatio­n, sharing concerns of families who have lost loved ones in longterm-care homes.

Niagara Centre MPP Jeff Burch called it a “wrong-headed move.”

“They should be concentrat­ing on protecting seniors against COVID,” he said.

Premier Doug Ford has offered assurances that longterm-care home operators will still be held accountabl­e.

Although the province has said its legislatio­n was designed to protect front-line workers and small businesses who are following public health rules, Will said it also diminishes the deterrents that civil law offers.

“If they’re thinking that this bill is necessary to make things better and easier to reopen the economy or to provide a better level of care to people in longterm-care homes, I mean it’s just the opposite effect because it really protects the bad actors.”

Lundy Manor did not respond to requests for an interview Thursday.

 ?? JULIE JOCSAK TORSTAR ?? Lundy Manor and its owner Oxford Living are among nine long-termcare homes facing lawsuits.
JULIE JOCSAK TORSTAR Lundy Manor and its owner Oxford Living are among nine long-termcare homes facing lawsuits.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada