The Niagara Falls Review

Canadians support pharmacare and it’s now time to get on with making it a reality

- STEVE MORGAN, DR. NAV PERSAUD, MARC-ANDRÉ GAGNON AND DR. DANIELLE MARTIN

National pharmacare is needed — and supported — now, more than ever. A new national survey by the Angus Reid Institute makes this clear.

The survey results indicate more than half a million Canadian households have lost prescripti­on drug coverage during the dual health and economic crises of COVID-19. In total, more than one in 10 Canadian households has no prescripti­on drug coverage at all. Millions of additional Canadian households (about one in seven) has inadequate coverage for prescripti­on drugs because, although they are insured, their insurance plans involve deductible­s and/or coinsuranc­e terms that require them to pay for most of their prescripti­on costs out-of-pocket.

As a result, one in five Canadian households paid more than $500 out-of-pocket for prescripti­ons over the past year. One in 10 households paid over $1,000 out-ofpocket.

This happens because Canada is the only high-income country with a universal health care system that does not include universal coverage of prescripti­on drugs.

Provinces provide some drug coverage, primarily for vulnerable segments of the population such as social assistance recipients and the elderly. But, for most Canadians, access to prescripti­on drug coverage is a “perk” associated with having a decent, full-time job in an organizati­on large enough to offer extended health benefits to its employees. The result is structural inequality in prescripti­on drug coverage and access in Canada.

Households with incomes between $50,000 and $100,000 are twice as likely to be uninsured for prescripti­on drugs as households with incomes over $100,000 are. Women and Canadians of colour are more likely to be uninsured than men and whites. Even after adjusting for age, income and education, immigrants and people of colour are less likely to have prescripti­on drug coverage than nonimmigra­nts and whites in Canada.

These inadequaci­es and inequities in prescripti­on drug coverage have significan­t effects on health.

The Angus Reid Institute survey shows Canadians in one in four households did not fill prescripti­ons or skipped doses because of out-of-pocket costs in the past year. Women, young people, people of colour and middle- and lowincome households are all more likely to experience these financial barriers.

Skipped prescripti­ons result in preventabl­e deteriorat­ion in health and increased use of our health care system by hundreds of thousands of Canadians every year. The Advisory Council on the Implementa­tion of National Pharmacare estimates that this is costing our hospital system more than $1 billion every year.

All of this is occurring at a time when Canadians are most vulnerable and when we most need to keep everyone healthy and out of hospitals that remain under intense pressure from COVID-19. What is particular­ly stunning about the lack of government action to solve this problem is the fact the solution — adding necessary medicines to medicare — would not only improve care, reduce disparitie­s and save lives, it would also save money. A lot of money.

Every credible estimate of the cost of a national pharmacare program — including estimates by Canada’s Parliament­ary Budget Officer and the Department of Finance — has found that such a system will save Canadians billions of dollars more than it will cost government to run.

So, when investing in Canada’s pandemic recovery, the choice isn’t pharmacare or another program. The choice is pharmacare and another program because pharmacare will literally save the money needed to do the other thing.

Canadians appear to understand this. They sure support it.

The Angus Reid Institute survey found that nearly nine in 10 Canadians support national pharmacare, eight in 10 want their provincial government­s to work with the federal government on this, and more than seven in 10 say this should be a high priority for government — even during the pandemic.

Furthermor­e, support for national pharmacare is strong across party lines. More than 19 in 20 Canadians who voted for the Liberals, NDP, or Greens support national pharmacare; and seven in 10 Conservati­ve voters do.

It is time government­s in Canada caught on. It is time for national pharmacare.

Steve Morgans PhD is a professor, UBC School of Population and Public Health. Dr. Nav Persaud, MD, MSc is a staff physician and Canada Research Chair in Health Justice, St. Michael’s Hospital and University of Toronto. Marc-André Gagnon, PhD, is associate professor, School of Public Policy and Administra­tion, Carleton University. Dr. Danielle Martin, MD, is executive vice-president and chief medical executive, Women’s College Hospital.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada