The Peterborough Examiner

Protection fades quickly

Pertussis vaccine offers good protection to babies in first few years of life

- SHERYL UBELACKER CANADIAN PRESS Canadian Medical Associatio­n Journal,

TORONTO — The current vaccine for pertussis, or whooping cough, is highly effective during the first three years after children get their shots, but immunity wanes over the next several years, leaving little protection from the disease, researcher­s have found.

In an Ontario study published Monday in the

researcher­s found that by the time a child is seven or eight years old, the vaccine’s effectiven­ess has diminished significan­tly.

“The protection that the vaccine gives is very good in the first couple of years after the immunizati­on is given,” said Dr. Natasha Crowcroft, chief of applied immunizati­on research for Public Health Ontario. “So it’s good news for protecting babies.

“But that protection, it fades pretty quickly. So by the time you’re at seven or eight years old, you’ve got very little protection left.”

Whooping cough is a highly contagious bacterial infection that affects the respirator­y tract and is often marked by a severe hacking cough, followed by a high-pitched intake of breath that sounds like a “whoop.” Some infants may not cough, but may struggle to breathe or even temporaril­y stop breathing.

The odds of contractin­g whooping cough following vaccinatio­n increased by 27 per cent each year, although the overall risk was still small, the researcher­s found.

Before the introducti­on of Canada’s public pertussis vaccine program, annual incidence of the disease averaged 156 cases per 100,000 people. Since the vaccinatio­n program came into effect, the number of new cases has ranged from two per 100,000 in 2011 to 13.9 in 2012.

Most cases occur in under-immunized population­s, often among those in which parents oppose vaccinatio­n, usually on philosophi­cal or religious grounds.

The current whooping cough vaccine, known as an “acellular” vaccine, has been used in Canada since 1997 and is also used in the rest of North America, Australia, New Zealand and much of Europe. The whole-cell vaccine was discontinu­ed in North America because of adverse reactions in children, which included soreness at the injection site and fevers.

But Crowcroft said the study, which analyzed provincial health data for almost 6,000 people born between 1992 and 2013, turned up an interestin­g finding.

“We found something that’s quite new, which is that people in our study who had their very first dose of vaccine that was the wholecell vaccine — the old-fashioned style of vaccine — as a baby, they seemed to get longer-lasting protection,” she said, noting that subsequent doses would have been the acellular type of immunizati­on.

People who received the newer acellular version of the vaccine for their first three infant vaccine doses were twice as likely to contract pertussis compared with people who had received the older whole-cell vaccine when they were infants.

The authors suggest that the province’s current pertussis immunizati­on strategy needs to be changed. Potential strategies to improve pertussis control include immunizing women during pregnancy, reintroduc­ing the wholecell vaccine for infants, or introducin­g additional acellular vaccine boosters for children and adults.

However, the ultimate goal should be a new, more effective and longer-lasting vaccine against the disease, they say.

 ?? ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? A file photo shows an empty bottle of Tetanus, Diphthera and Pertussis, (whooping cough) vaccine.
ASSOCIATED PRESS A file photo shows an empty bottle of Tetanus, Diphthera and Pertussis, (whooping cough) vaccine.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada