The Peterborough Examiner

Liberal national security bill to boost federal border agency accountabi­lity

- JIM BRONSKILL THE CANADIAN PRESS

OTTAWA — The Liberal government plans to introduce widerangin­g national security legislatio­n next week that will include more robust oversight of Canada’s border agency.

In addition to new eyes looking over the shoulder of the Canada Border Services Agency, the package will propose changes to ensure existing security watchdogs can exchange informatio­n and collaborat­e more easily on reviews, The Canadian Press has learned.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has consistent­ly said his government has a responsibi­lity to give security agencies the tools they need to keep Canadians safe, while preserving the rights and freedoms people cherish.

In that vein, the extensive set of measures will also follow through on Liberal promises during the last election to deal with “problemati­c elements” of omnibus security legislatio­n ushered in by the previous Conservati­ve government after a gunman stormed Parliament Hill.

The Conservati­ves created a new offence of promoting the commission of terrorist offences and broadened the government’s nofly list powers.

They also gave the Canadian Security Intelligen­ce Service explicit authority to derail terrorist threats, not just gather informatio­n about them. However, many Canadians have expressed concerns that such disruption activities could violate the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

The Trudeau government has committed to ensuring all CSIS warrants respect the charter, to preserving legitimate protest and advocacy, and to defining terrorist propaganda more clearly.

It has also pledged that appeals by Canadians on the no-fly list will be subject to mandatory review.

Tens of thousands of people took part in the government’s national security consultati­on and Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale recently said there was “a tremendous amount of consensus” on the platform promises.

The Liberals have already taken legislativ­e steps to fulfil one of those commitment­s — creation of a special committee of parliament­arians to scrutinize security and intelligen­ce activities, including those of the border services agency.

However, civil libertaria­ns, refugee lawyers and committees of both the House of Commons and Senate have called in recent years to do more by institutin­g some form of independen­t monitoring of the border agency.

The British Columbia Civil Liberties Associatio­n issued a report this week outlining its proposals for civilian oversight and review of the agency.

Border officers can stop travellers for questionin­g, take blood and breath samples, and search, detain and arrest citizens and non-citizens without a warrant. The border agency’s role in immigratio­n detention has come under scrutiny following in-custody deaths.

But unlike the RCMP and CSIS, the border agency is not overseen by a dedicated review or complaints body.

Another nagging issue has long been the inability of existing watchdogs to share informatio­n about security-related complaints and cases due to legal restrictio­ns.

It means watchdogs are often prevented from following the thread of investigat­ions that involve several intelligen­ce and police services, leaving complainan­ts frustrated.

Legislativ­e measures to permit sharing and co-operation would address decade-old recommenda­tions from the commission of inquiry that examined the overseas torture of Maher Arar, a Canadian telecommun­ications engineer who was imprisoned in Syria.

The Liberal national security consultati­ons revealed a strong desire to reduce the number of false positive matches with Canada’s nofly list and to improve the appeal process for anyone placed on the list, says a government summary.

A majority who took part in the consultati­ons said the public safety minister should be required to decide within 90 days on any applicatio­n from someone to have his or her name removed from the list.

It is clear from the results the federal consultati­ons that Canadians have significan­t concerns regarding privacy and government accountabi­lity with sensitive data, said David Christophe­r, a spokesman for OpenMedia, which works to keep the Internet surveillan­ce-free.

“We’ll be watching next week’s announceme­nt very closely, and judging the government’s proposals against what Canadians said loud and clear during the consultati­on.”

 ?? ADRIAN WYLD/THE CANADIAN PRESS ?? Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale speaks during question period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Thursday.
ADRIAN WYLD/THE CANADIAN PRESS Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale speaks during question period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Thursday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada