The Peterborough Examiner

War of the noses

As manufactur­ers make more of their products smell, consumers are putting up more of a stink

- ELISABETH LEAMY

“More and more, I walk into homes, stores and businesses and am greeted with an immediate blast of perfumed air ... And what is added scent but a chemical? Why breathe that in constantly?”

When a Washington Post reader wrote the comments above and implored me to write an article about how to avoid scented products, I was an easy sell. I find artificial­ly perfumed products so distractin­g that I have trouble concentrat­ing in their presence. I can’t stand to have certain brands of dryer sheets in my house, even in an unopened box in the basement. And I confess that I once sneaked an air freshener out of an Uber and tossed it in the trash!

Despite negative reactions from some consumers, scented products seem to be gaining popularity. For example, plastic garbage bags never used to be scented, but an industry blog says that many now are and that “the market is a fiercely competitiv­e one, so the battle to win the noses of consumers is on.”

As manufactur­ers make more of their products smell, consumers are putting up more of a stink. Dozens of blogs rail against scented products, including one called “Fragrance Free Living” and another called “Think Before You Stink.” These bloggers call fragrance “the new second-hand smoke.” They’re not crazy. The U.S. Environmen­tal Protection Agency says indoor air pollution is real, partly because of fragrances, and that our homes and offices “can be more seriously polluted than the outdoor air in even the largest and most industrial­ized cities.”

The people who suffer the most from fragrances are those with multiple chemical sensitivit­y, or MCS.

“Fragrances rank high among the chemical exposures I find problemati­c,” said Alison Johnson, who has MCS and founded the Chemical Sensitivit­y Foundation. “One thing that alarms me is that in the last few years, the phone calls and emails I’m receiving are now predominan­tly from people in a panic because exposure to fragrances in the workplace is making it impossible for them to keep a job.”

Johnson produced an educationa­l video and is lobbying lawmakers to mandate fragrancef­ree workplaces.

But artificial fragrances aren’t just a problem for certain groups. More than a third of Americans surveyed reported experienci­ng health problems when exposed to them, according to a study by Anne Steinemann of the University of Melbourne.

“All fragranced products that I tested ... emitted chemicals classified as hazardous air pollutants,” Steinemann said in an email. “You may not realize you’re being affected until it’s too late.”

The Canadian Center for Occupation­al Health and Safety lists the following possible symptoms of exposure to fragrances: “headaches, dizziness, nausea, fatigue, weakness, insomnia, numbness, upper respirator­y symptoms, shortness of breath, skin irritation, malaise, confusion and difficulty with concentrat­ion.”

If you’re allergic to nuts or sensitive to gluten, you usually can read the ingredient­s on a food package and steer clear. By contrast, fragrances have long been considered trade secrets, so the federal government doesn’t require manufactur­ers to print what’s in them. The Food and Drug Administra­tion requires manufactur­ers to list the ingredient­s in personal-care products, but they are allowed to just state “fragrance” as an ingredient, rather than spelling out what chemicals are in the fragrance.

Federal regulation­s for household cleaning products are even looser. Manufactur­ers are not required to list any of these products’ ingredient­s. A few big companies have begun disclosing their ingredient­s voluntaril­y, including SC Johnson, Clorox and Reckitt Benckiser, maker of Lysol. Two states, California and New York, recently took matters into their own hands, passing laws requiring manufactur­ers to divulge the ingredient­s in their cleaning products.

Here’s another confusing labelling issue involving fragrances: The terms “unscented” and “fragrance-free” sound the same but are totally different. Unscented means that a product doesn’t have a detectable odour — but it does not mean that it contains no artificial scents. Manufactur­ers are allowed to use artificial scents in “unscented” products if they are there to cover up the smell of other ingredient­s.

By contrast, “fragrance-free” is the label to look for if you are bothered by chemical fragrances, as it means no artificial smells have been added to a product.

You can double-check this claim, if there are ingredient­s listed, by looking for the words “perfume,” “parfum” or “fragrance” on the list.

 ?? GETTY ?? The U.S. Environmen­tal Protection Agency says indoor air pollution is real, partly because of fragrances.
GETTY The U.S. Environmen­tal Protection Agency says indoor air pollution is real, partly because of fragrances.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada