The Peterborough Examiner

Plan to retrieve Titanic radio spurs debate

Those opposed concerned that human remains could still be on site

- BEN FINLEY

NORFOLK, VA. — People have been diving to the Titanic’s wreck for 35 years. No one has found human remains, according to the company that owns the salvage rights.

But the company’s plan to retrieve the ship’s iconic radio equipment has sparked a debate: Could the world’s most famous shipwreck still hold remains of passengers and crew who died a century ago?

Lawyers for the U.S. government have raised that question in an ongoing court battle to block the planned expedition. They cite archaeolog­ists who say remains could still be there. And they say the company fails to consider the prospect in its dive plan.

“Fifteen hundred people died in that wreck,” said Paul Johnston, curator of maritime history at the Smithsonia­n’s National Museum of American Histo- ry. “You some can’t e hu possibly man re tell mai me ns aren’t buried deep somewhere where there are no currents.”

The company, RMS Titanic Inc., wants to exhibit the ship’s Marconi wireless telegraph machine. It broadcast the sinking ocean liner’s distress calls and helped save about 700 people in lifeboats.

Retrieving the equipment wwould require an unmanned submersibl­e to slip through a skylight or cut into a heavily corroded roof on the ship’s deck. A suction dredge would remove loose silt, while manipulato­r arms could cut electrical cords.

RMS Titanic Inc. says human remains likely would’ve been noticed after roughly 200 dives.

“It’s not like taking a shovel to Gettysburg,” said David Gallo, an oceanograp­her and company adviser. “And there’s an unwritten rule that, should we see human remains, we turn off the cameras and decide what to do next.”

The dispute stems from a larger debate over how the Titanic’s victims should be honoured, and whether an expedition should be allowed to enter its hull.

In May, a federal judge in Norfolk, Va., approved the expedition.

U.S. District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith wrote that recovering the radio “will contribute to the legacy left by the indelible loss of the Titanic, those who survived, and those who gave their lives.”

But the U.S. government filed a legal challenge in June, claiming the undertakin­g would violate federal law and a pact with Britain recognizin­g the wreck as a memorial site. U.S. attorneys argue the agreement regulates entry into the wreck to ensure its hull, artifacts and “any human remains” are undisturbe­d.

The case is pending before the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond.

The Titanic was travelling ffrom England to New York in 11912 when it struck an iceberg and sank in the North Atlantic. The wreck was discovered in 1985.

Over the years, explorers have sent remotely operated vehicles into parts of the ship. During his 2001 expedition, film director James Cameron surveyed the area in a deckhouse tthat holds the telegraph equip- ment, according to court documents filed by the company.

People on both sides of the debate claim the issue is being played down — or up — to support an argument.

RMS Titanic Inc. president Bretton Hunchak told The Associated Press the government’s position is based on emotion rather than science.

“Issues like this are used simply to raise public support,” Hunchak said.

The firm is the court-recognized steward of Titanic artifacts, overseeing thousands of items including silverware, china and gold coins.

“This company has always treated the wreck as both an archeologi­cal site and a grave- site with reverence and respect,” Hunchak said. “And that doesn’t change whether in fact human remains could possibly exist.”

Gallo said remnants of those wwho died likely disappeare­d de- cades ago.

Sea creatures would’ve eaten away flesh because protein is scarce in the deep ocean, and bones dissolve at great ocean depths because of seawater’s chemistry, Gallo said. The Ti- tanic sits about 3.8 kilometres below the surface.

Yet whale bones have been discovered at similar depths, as wwere human remains on a 2009 Air France plane that crashed into the Atlantic.

Johnston wrote to the court tthat remains could be “within tthe confines of the wreck or outside in the debris field” in areas lacking oxygen.

 ?? THE ASSOCIATED PRESS VIA UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND AND THE NOAA OFFICE OF OCEAN EXPLORATIO­N ?? This 2004 image shows the shoes of one of the possible victims of the Titanic disaster. A company’s plan to retrieve the Titanic’s radio has sparked a debate over whether the famous shipwreck still holds human remains.
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS VIA UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND AND THE NOAA OFFICE OF OCEAN EXPLORATIO­N This 2004 image shows the shoes of one of the possible victims of the Titanic disaster. A company’s plan to retrieve the Titanic’s radio has sparked a debate over whether the famous shipwreck still holds human remains.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada