Quebec forced to confront racism in 2020
Reticence to accept term ‘systemic racism’ makes change difficult: prof
MONTREAL — It was a former CFL player and community activist who helped push the concept of systemic racism to the forefront in Quebec politics this year, after forcing the City of Montreal to confront the issue.
Balarama Holness used a provision in the city’s charter to trigger a public consultation that would include 7,000 participants and produce 38 recommendations, including that Montreal recognize the systemic nature of racism and discrimination against racialized groups.
Holness’s petition — signed by more than 22,000 people — was launched in 2018, but the results were released last June, shortly after the police-involved killing of George Floyd in Minnesota, which sparked anti-racism protests in the United States, Canada and around the world.
“The actions taken in Quebec and Montreal right now on issues of racism are directly derived from the public consultation that was forced on the city,” Holness said during a recent interview.
And while Montreal’s mayor has said she recognized systemic racism existed and has vowed changes, the Quebec government has refused to accept the term. Instead, Premier François Legault created an antiracism task force the same day in June the report in Montreal came out.
Holness said he believes the reticence toward using the term “systemic racism” comes from a fear among the majority of white Quebecers of seeing an erosion of their rights. “Their miscomprehension of the term also fuels this level of ignorance whereby systemic racism means all Quebecers are racist, which is simply not the case,” Holness said.
The current debate over the term in Quebec is years in the making. Three years ago, the Liberals tried to hold a public consultation on systemic racism but cancelled the event after outcry from the public and the opposition.
The government at the time said the consultation would amount to putting Quebecers on trial — an argument Legault has often repeated.
Quebec’s unwillingness to address the systemic nature of racism — those biases, policies and practices entrenched in institutions — makes it difficult to address the issues, according to Dr. Myrna Lashley, assistant professor in McGill’s psychiatry department.
“How do you fix the hole in your roof if you don’t acknowledge there’s a hole in your roof?” she said in a recent interview. “How do you think you’re fixing something that doesn’t exist?”
She dismissed the idea that white Quebecers would be put on trial if the government acknowledged the systemic nature of racism. “I don’t think they’ve looked at it from that perspective,” she said of white Quebecers. “I don’t think these are bad people, they’ve never lived it, they don’t understand it.
“It’s quite annoying when someone who hasn’t lived the reality tells you it doesn’t exist.”
And despite the government’s attempts to move on from acknowledging the term, Legault and his cabinet have been confronted with a number of cases this year from groups urging they recognize systemic racism in Quebec.
One of those cases involved the death of Joyce Echaquan, a 37-year-old Atikamekw mother of seven who died in hospital in Joliette, Que., in September, after filming staff using derogatory slurs against her. In the wake of her death, her family and her community produced a document called “Joyce’s Principle,” which called for a series of measures to assure that Indigenous people have equitable access to health services without discrimination.
The Legault government said it agreed with most aspects of the document, except the reference to systemic racism.
Unlike other anti-racism activists, Holness said he believes Quebec doesn’t need to recognize systemic racism to address the problem. He said the Legault government recognizes many underlying issues in society such as racial profiling, underrepresentation of racialized people in the civil service and high unemployment among some immigrant communities.
“What they deem to be racism is what we call systemic racism — they’re still dealing with the issue, they’re just not saying the word,” Holness said. “We can still advance these issues and move beyond the debate of the term.”