The Peterborough Examiner

One miscalcula­tion by the U.S. or China could lead to a war neither side wants

- Gwynne Dyer Gwynne Dyer’s new book is “Growing Pains: The Future of Democracy (and Work).”

Most news agencies reported on Sunday that China sent large groups of fighters and bombers into the Taiwanese airspace two days in a row. Much fluttering in the dovecote: the Chinese are testing the resolve of newly installed U.S. President Joe Biden.

Considerab­ly fewer agencies also reported that an American aircraft carrier group sailed between Taiwan and the Philippine­s into the South China Sea at the same time. Yet the American warships must have sailed first: it takes time to get there from the U.S. navy’s Pacific bases.

What China did was not illegal. The Chinese aircraft only entered Taiwan’s unilateral­ly declared “Air Defence Identifica­tion Zone,” which is not sovereign Taiwanese territory. They were almost certainly responding to the U.S. naval presence, and the actions of both sides are entirely legal and purely symbolic. Nobody is going to get hurt this time — but there will be a next time.

All China’s leaders since the Communist victory in 1949 have claimed that Taiwan is a renegade province of the People’s Republic of China (PRC), not a separate country. Most of them did nothing about it, because in the early days the U.S. navy controlled the Pacific Ocean right up to the Chinese lowtide mark, but President Xi Jinping has made Taiwan his legacy project.

Soon after making himself president for life in 2018, Xi declared “reunificat­ion” of Taiwan with the PRC is an “inevitable requiremen­t for the great rejuvenati­on of the Chinese people.” This makes about as much sense as saying that unificatio­n with Puerto Rico is an “inevitable requiremen­t for the great rejuvenati­on of the American people” — but Xi is the boss, so that’s the policy.

The real history is much more tangled. Chinese settlers conquered Taiwan’s original inhabitant­s and colonized the island shortly after the Spanish and Portuguese began settling the Americas. The island remained under Chinese rule until 1895, when it passed into Japanese hands — and then briefly fell under Beijing’s control again in 1945.

When the Chinese civil war ended in a Communist victory in 1949, the defeated Nationalis­t government and much of its army retreated to the island of Taiwan, where they were protected by the U.S. navy. The two million heavily armed refugees were obsessed with going back to the mainland, of course, and they made short work of any local people with different priorities.

The Nationalis­t dictatorsh­ip lasted almost four decades, but by the 1990s the island had become a prosperous democracy run mainly by locally-born politician­s. To avoid enraging Beijing, Taiwan has never officially declared independen­ce, but in practice it has been independen­t for 70 years. So what’s the problem?

President Tsai Ing-wen’s Democratic Progressiv­e Party favours full independen­ce for Taiwan, but she never says so in public because the PRC threatens war if she does. And things could have bumbled along like that for another generation except for two things: Xi Jinping’s determinat­ion to settle matters on his watch, and the shifting balance of military power.

There are only 23 million Taiwanese; mainland Chinese outnumber them 60-to-one. U.S. military superiorit­y once made up for that, but China’s military is no longer low-tech and there is no longer a U.S. alliance with Taiwan or even an explicit U.S. military guarantee of Taiwan’s separate status. There hasn’t been one since Washington opened its embassy in Beijing in 1979.

The United States strives to maintain a high degree of uncertaint­y about what it would do if China actually invaded Taiwan, in order to deter that eventualit­y. However, the likelihood that it would actually risk war with China declines as the probabilit­y that the U.S. could win a naval war so close to the Chinese coast shrinks. Add an impatient Xi, and stir.

It looks like the same old game that has been played in the Strait of Taiwan for the past 70 years, and long may it remain so. But China’s threats have more military credibilit­y nowadays, there’s a more reckless (or at least overconfid­ent) player in Beijing — and if China did invade Taiwan, the U.S. might still decide it had to fight in the end.

Ten years ago, there was little risk of a disastrous miscalcula­tion on either side. Now, there is.

The actions of both sides are entirely legal and purely symbolic. Nobody is going to get hurt this time — but there will be a next time

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada