The Prince George Citizen

Mueller probe could just be getting started

- PAUL WALDMAN — Paul Waldman is an opinion writer for the Plum Line blog. Citizen news service

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigat­ion into Russian interferen­ce in the 2016 election and related matters turns one year old Thursday, and Republican­s are simply disgusted that it could have dragged on this long. Their position is summed up by the president:

Donald J. Trump tweeted “Congratula­tions America, we are now into the second year of the greatest Witch Hunt in American History. . .and there is still No Collusion and No Obstructio­n. The only Collusion was that done by Democrats who were unable to win an Election despite the spending of far more money!”

As President Trump’s crackerjac­k lawyer Rudy Giuliani put it on Fox: “It’s about time to get the darn thing over with. It’s about time to say, ‘Enough. We’ve tortured this president enough.’”

The truth, however, is that Mueller’s investigat­ion has been both fruitful and efficient compared with many similar investigat­ions of administra­tion officials. To make that clear, let me offer you a selection of prior investigat­ions conducted by independen­t and special counsels, along with the length of time they took to conclude:

• Iran-Contra: 6 years, 8 months (1986-1993)

• Samuel Pierce, HUD corruption: 9 years (1990-1999)

• Bush administra­tion, improper search of passport records: 3 years (1992-1995)

• Henry Cisneros, mistress payments: 11 years (1995-2006)

• Mike Espy, gifts from agricultur­e company: 6 years (19942001)

• Bill and Hillary Clinton, White- water: 6 years 8 months (19942000)

• Scooter Libby, CIA leak: 3 1/2 years (2003-2007)

In all these cases, people complained that the investigat­ions went on too long, and they were often right. But some of them certainly warranted a lengthy investigat­ion. Iran-Contra was a sweeping conspiracy involving multiple crimes committed by multiple people in the Reagan administra­tion, in which arms were sold to Iran and the profits taken to fund an illegal proxy war in Central America. Even if almost seven years was too long, it would have been ridiculous to suggest that a single year would have been enough.

Other investigat­ions were absurdly lengthy given what they were investigat­ing; for instance, HUD secretary Henry Cisneros lied to the FBI during his back- ground check about money he had paid to his mistress, which was indeed against the law but hardly warranted an investigat­ion that went through multiple phases and wasn’t completely closed for 11 years.

But no one is suggesting that Mueller will need another 10 years to get to the bottom of the Trump omni-scandal. Informed observers looking from the outside believe that he’ll be finished by the end of this year or the beginning of next year, meaning the whole thing will be wrapped up in less than two years.

One of the most important things to remember about Mueller’s critics is that, like all of us, they have only a general sense of what Mueller has been doing. His investigat­ion has been leakproof; whenever we learn something about it, it’s via someone who has testified to the grand jury or the substance of court filings. There’s zero indication that Mueller has been anything but thorough and profession­al, which is exactly why he, a lifelong Republican and widely respected law enforcemen­t official, was picked for the job.

Now let’s do a quick rundown of what Mueller has so far produced:

• An indictment of 13 individual­s and 3 companies in connection with Russian efforts to infiltrate and manipulate the 2016 election.

• Indictment­s on multiple charges against former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort.

• Guilty pleas from former Trump aides Michael Flynn, Rick Gates, and George Papadopoul­os, offered in exchange for their cooperatio­n.

• Guilty pleas from two other figures, Alex van der Zwaan and Richard Pinedo, tangential­ly connected to the original investigat­ion. There is obviously much more on its way.

We have to remind ourselves of the scale of what Mueller has to investigat­e. It starts with the fact that a hostile foreign government mounted a comprehens­ive effort to swing the results of an American election. That we have to actually argue about whether or not that is a big deal is utterly insane. Then there are Trump’s efforts to obstruct justice, for which there is ample evidence.

Then you move to the other potential crimes the investigat­ion has uncovered along the way, like Paul Manafort’s alleged moneylaund­ering and Michael Cohen’s Trump Tower-sized pile of potential crimes. Given what we know and what we’re learning literally on a daily basis, nobody sincerely thinks that Manafort and Cohen aren’t going to wind up behind bars.

When it comes to Cohen in particular, his misdeeds keep leading back to Trump.

The fact that Trump has now admitted that he lied about what he knew about the hush money Cohen arranged for Stormy Daniels is just the tip of a very dirty iceberg, a colorful illustrati­on of the fact that we have only the barest idea what the investigat­ion will uncover about the Trump Organizati­on and Trump himself.

The president may be the single most corrupt prominent business figure in America, and once prosecutor­s start examining that business, they’re going to have a lot of work to do.

So no, this investigat­ion hasn’t gone on too long.

All indication­s are that Mueller is moving with all appropriat­e speed; the trouble is that there’s just so much potential malfeasanc­e to examine.

And no amount of hand-waving from Rudy Giuliani or cries of “Witch hunt!” from the president will change that.

 ?? JABIN BOTSFORD/CITIZEN NEWS SERVICE PHOTO ?? Contrary to the protests of President Donald Trump and many Republican­s, Robert Mueller isn’t taking anywhere near as long as other independen­t and special counsels to complete his investigat­ion.
JABIN BOTSFORD/CITIZEN NEWS SERVICE PHOTO Contrary to the protests of President Donald Trump and many Republican­s, Robert Mueller isn’t taking anywhere near as long as other independen­t and special counsels to complete his investigat­ion.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada