The Prince George Citizen

Lumber tariff drop welcomed

- Arthur WilliAms Citizen staff — With files from The Canadian Press

News the U.S. government plans to reduce duties on Canadian softwood lumber is good for B.C. lumber producers, according to the president of a forest industry group, but it won't solve all of the sector's woes.

On Feb. 3, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the preliminar­y results of its first administra­tive review of the anti-dumping and countervai­ling duties on Canadian lumber. If the proposed preliminar­y rates are adopted, B.C. lumber producers could see duties cut by more than in half in August.

"Obviously we're pleased with the preliminar­y findings," B.C. Council of Forest Industries (COFI) president Susan Yurkovich said. "I should note... it doesn't change the deposits we're paying right now."

Canada's legal team and COFI's lawyers are reviewing the preliminar­y decision, in what has been an ongoing and complex trade dispute between Canada and the U.S., she said.

Canada and COFI's stance has always been that the duties are unfair and unjustifie­d, that Canada doesn't unfairly subsidize its forest sector, Yurkovich said. It's a position which has been upheld repeatedly by the World Trade Organizati­on and NAFTA panels.

Since Dec. 28, 2017, Canadian producers have been paying 20.23 per cent at the U.S. border, with three major B.C.-based producers – Canfor, Tolko and West Fraser – facing even higher duties.

The U.S. Department of Commerce's proposed cash deposit rate would drop to 8.21 per cent. Canfor would see its deposit rate drop from 20.52 per cent down to 4.63 per cent; West Fraser's deposit rate would drop from 23.56 per cent to 9.08 per cent; and Tolko's rate would drop from 22.07 per cent to 8.21 per cent.

The U.S. Department of Commerce launched a second review on Jan. 2 this year, which could make different recommenda­tions and change the industry landscape again, Yurkovich said.

"Its taking a lot of resources from the Canadian industry – financial resources and human resources which would be better used growing the forest sector in Canada and the U.S," she said.

But even if the duties were eliminated tomorrow, it wouldn't solve all the issues facing B.C.'s forest sector, Yurkovich said.

"We're a high-cost jurisdicti­on," she said. "Secure access to (wood) fibre at a reasonable cost is the single most-important factor in keeping mills operating."

A spokespers­on for Canfor declined to comment on the decision, however investors responded quickly to the news.

In early trading in Toronto on Tuesday, Canfor stock rose as much as 7.5 per cent, West Fraser Timber jumped by 6.2 per cent and Resolute Forest Products Inc. was up three per cent.

On Monday, CIBC analyst Hamir Patel quoted "trade contacts" in a report that suggested average U.S. duties would drop from about US$67 per thousand board feet to about US$30 based on current pricing levels of about US$400.

The report says it's unlikely that Canadian companies will receive any refund or credit for overpaymen­t until the trade dispute is resolved, something not expected for two to three years.

"According to trade contacts, preliminar­y revised duty determinat­ions from the U.S. government have been communicat­ed to the Canadian industry," Patel said. "We expect Canadian lumber equities to respond positively to this news as these rate revisions were better than most Canadian industry participan­ts were expecting."

This is the fifth time Canada and the U.S. have fought over the same issues.

In September, a joint Canada-U.S. trade panel gave the United States 90 days to rethink its tariffs, finding there was no evidence Canadian imports were causing injury to the U.S. industry.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada