The Province

Keep provinces in charge of independen­t schools

- Ben Eisen and Angela MacLeod

Now that Andrew Scheer has been elected leader of the federal Conservati­ve party, there is heightened interest in his policy ideas, including his plan to provide tax deductions of up to $4,000 per student for families with children in independen­t schools.

Although Scheer is correct to spotlight the burden independen­t school tuition places on families, his proposal — that the federal government (rather than the provinces) provide assistance — is misguided and could lead to serious unintended consequenc­es for education in Canada. More on that in a minute.

Government support for independen­t schools benefits many families. Approximat­ely 368,000 students attend nearly 2,000 independen­t schools across the country.

Although independen­t schools are often stereotype­d as elite institutio­ns for “the rich,” the facts tell a different story. According to recent research, the vast majority of Canadian independen­t schools are not stereotypi­cally elite prep schools, and a recent study from B.C. suggests that (at least in this province) average incomes for families relying on “non-elite” independen­t schools are almost identical to families that rely on government-run public schools.

Subsequent­ly, public assistance for independen­t schools helps families of varied economic profiles, not just the rich, by making more options available to families.

Given these facts, there is a strong case for government support for independen­t schools. Which brings us back to Scheer, whose plan to provide this support via a federal tax deduction is misguided. And here’s why:

In Canada, K-12 education falls under provincial jurisdicti­on — there is no federal ministry of education like in the United States. To implement a federal tax deduction, Ottawa would have to create qualificat­ions for schools to be eligible. With 10 different provinces operating their own ministries of education, and numerous pieces of legislatio­n overseeing the regulation and financing (if applicable) of independen­t schools, there is not a simple national definition of an independen­t school.

Even within provinces there are different types and categories of independen­t schools, each with a different level of regulation and/ or government funding. For example, three Western provinces — B.C., Alberta and Saskatchew­an — each have four distinct categories of independen­t schools.

If the federal government gets involved and creates its own conditions for federal tax deduction eligibilit­y, it will add yet another layer of complicati­on to the regulation of independen­t schools.

What’s more, a federal tuition deduction would open the door to greater federal control over education systems across Canada. One reason several Canadian provinces (B.C., for example) have high-performing education systems by internatio­nal standards is that provinces are allowed to innovate and experiment with education funding and delivery models that suit them.

Simply look at the recent history of education policy in the United States to see the danger of federal interventi­on in policy areas best left to sub-national government­s. Prior to 1979, there was very little federal involvemen­t in K-12 education until President Jimmy Carter created a federal cabinet post for education and started spending federal dollars to achieve his objectives and monitor performanc­e from Washington. Since then, public spending on education has soared while student performanc­e has declined.

Like in the U.S., greater federal involvemen­t in Canada could fundamenta­lly reshape the decentrali­zed nature of our approach to education policy, lead to policy homogeneit­y and hurt student performanc­e.

Canada’s health care system, which underperfo­rms relative to other universal health care countries, provides another cautionary tale.

Health care remains a provincial policy area heavily regulated by federal rules. These rules forbid many types of policy experiment­ation and are largely responsibl­e for policy inertia, underperfo­rmance, and inefficien­cy. We should not risk imposing the same fate on our children’s schools.

Scheer deserves credit for putting the issue of government support for independen­t schools on the policy agenda. However, education has fallen within provincial policy jurisdicti­on since Confederat­ion, and that is where it should stay.

Ben Eisen and Angela MacLeod are analysts at the Fraser Institute.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada