The Province

Was Gadot underpaid?

HOLLYWOOD: There’s context to consider when evaluating her salary

- — WENN.COM FILES MICHAEL CAVNA

Does Wonder Woman pull down the same kind of coin as Superman?

An Elle.com story published Monday picked up major heat by setting up the highly dubious comparison that Henry Cavill was paid $14 million for 2013’s Man of Steel — his first outing as Superman — while Gal Gadot reportedly earned $300,000 for her titular debut in the current white-hot blockbuste­r Wonder Woman. (Gadot’s upfront salary was reported by Variety in 2014, via an Israeli entertainm­ent show.)

After that story went viral, however, Elle.com published an update to say the outlet has been unable to confirm Cavill’s $14 million payday, which Forbes reported in 2016 and practicall­y begs for a lasso of truth.

So much informatio­n is unknown here. Reports of Gadot’s payday don’t indicate what percentage “points” she might have negotiated from her new film’s total gross, for example. They also don’t indicate the comparativ­e salaries of Cavill and Gadot for 2016’s Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, in which they appeared together.

Plus, a source familiar with tentpole-film salary talks told Vanity Fair that of that $14 million figure, with or without bonuses or points, “It certainly isn’t for one picture. That’s insane.”

It’s entirely plausible — even likely, in fact — that Cavill and Gadot were paid on a near-identical scale for their debut outings in a DC costume. (One source told the Hollywood Reporter that Gadot made the same upfront, “if not slightly more.”) Such actors seldom have the leverage — in the post-2007 era of connected cinematic universes — to command a base salary in the millions for their rookie superhero outing. (That, of course, doesn’t necessaril­y apply to supporting roles filled by such on-the-marquee legends as Anthony Hopkins, Morgan Freeman or Robert Redford.)

Superhero actors who begin leading a tentpole generally earn in the low- to mid-six figures initially in upfront salary (points and bonus benchmarks aside) and typically play the long game: you want the security of a multi-picture deal if you’re lesser-known, but you also want the flexibilit­y to build in higher pay if your franchise actually becomes a billion-dollar behemoth. Case in point: expect Gadot to renegotiat­e for the sequel. (Wonder Woman has already racked up $573 million in worldwide gross — on track to pass Man of Steel’s $668 million total.)

The deeper context is Hollywood’s long, lingering gender-pay imbalance. In 2015, the debate made headlines again when Jennifer Lawrence initially expressed anger upon learning through the Sony hack that her American Hustle male co-stars made more than she and Amy Adams did.

Wonder Woman fans are invested in seeing that Gadot — and director Patty Jenkins — get their equal share. The film has been the DC Extended Universe’s only critical hit so far and is a success thanks largely to the vision and contributi­ons of leading women.

 ??  ?? Reports of Gal Gadot’s payday don’t compare salaries of the Wonder Woman star and Henry Cavill for 2016’s Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, where they appeared together.
Reports of Gal Gadot’s payday don’t compare salaries of the Wonder Woman star and Henry Cavill for 2016’s Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, where they appeared together.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada